I have played the Eleven Rack and POD HD, but still haven't tried an AxeFX II. I know how the older AxeFX Ultra sounds but I wasn't as impressed as the die-hard AxeFX fans seem to be. To me it kind of reminded me of a refined mix of the GT-8 and GSP1101. It sounded better, but still like a processor so I never really got the adulation about them.
The Eleven Rack was pretty impressive for the price. I thought it had a more realistic feel and sound than the POD HD, but it's still kind of flat and doesn't have the dimension that a real tube amp has. I'll never be able to keep a processor until they can emulate the depth and dimension tube amps have. That will probably never happen, but I wouldn't mind having an Eleven Rack around to copy some signature sounds for cover songs.
What I don't like about the Eleven Rack is ProTools which wouldn't install on any of my laptops or computers. Tech support was worthless to help, and their best recommendation was to purchase an expensive sound card. To tweak the Eleven Rack in ways you can do with a POD HD interface, you have to use the software. That was the case when they first came out and I don't know if that ever changed. Judging by the pathetic support I received from Avid, I wouldn't expect it to have been improved.
It's too bad because the Eleven Rack seems like Avid came out with a potentially great product convinced that it was perfect at the outset. Unfortunately, it's not and they don't seem to care to make it that way because they seem to have the attitude that it can't be improved on.
So the POD HD was pretty cool and did seem to have some improved tones, but something about the way it sounds still rubs me the wrong way. People say the AxeFX II is better than the predecessors and beats the Eleven Rack senseless, but I have yet to hear a patch that blows me away.
What are your thoughts on these processors? Which is best for live use the Eleven Rack, POD HD Pro, or AxeFX II?
The Eleven Rack was pretty impressive for the price. I thought it had a more realistic feel and sound than the POD HD, but it's still kind of flat and doesn't have the dimension that a real tube amp has. I'll never be able to keep a processor until they can emulate the depth and dimension tube amps have. That will probably never happen, but I wouldn't mind having an Eleven Rack around to copy some signature sounds for cover songs.
What I don't like about the Eleven Rack is ProTools which wouldn't install on any of my laptops or computers. Tech support was worthless to help, and their best recommendation was to purchase an expensive sound card. To tweak the Eleven Rack in ways you can do with a POD HD interface, you have to use the software. That was the case when they first came out and I don't know if that ever changed. Judging by the pathetic support I received from Avid, I wouldn't expect it to have been improved.
It's too bad because the Eleven Rack seems like Avid came out with a potentially great product convinced that it was perfect at the outset. Unfortunately, it's not and they don't seem to care to make it that way because they seem to have the attitude that it can't be improved on.
So the POD HD was pretty cool and did seem to have some improved tones, but something about the way it sounds still rubs me the wrong way. People say the AxeFX II is better than the predecessors and beats the Eleven Rack senseless, but I have yet to hear a patch that blows me away.
What are your thoughts on these processors? Which is best for live use the Eleven Rack, POD HD Pro, or AxeFX II?
Comment