Re: LES PAUL STUDIOS
I know i'm in the minority with this, but I've just got to say it.
I would take a Studio ANY day over a Standard because of the neck binding. Gibson does the worst neck binding of any guitar I've ever owned. The Studio with no binding is the best thing Gibson has ever done for the playability of a neck.
There I've said it.
Now don't anybody accuse me of not really knowing because I haven't owned a "REAL" Gibson. At least eleven or twelve over the years that I can remember. I have to say that the earlier ones (1960's) were pretty darn good, but the newer ones are crap! (Speaking of quality in general, but neck binding specifically).
If I've gotta have a Gibson, it hasta be without neck binding.
I know i'm in the minority with this, but I've just got to say it.
I would take a Studio ANY day over a Standard because of the neck binding. Gibson does the worst neck binding of any guitar I've ever owned. The Studio with no binding is the best thing Gibson has ever done for the playability of a neck.
There I've said it.
Now don't anybody accuse me of not really knowing because I haven't owned a "REAL" Gibson. At least eleven or twelve over the years that I can remember. I have to say that the earlier ones (1960's) were pretty darn good, but the newer ones are crap! (Speaking of quality in general, but neck binding specifically).
If I've gotta have a Gibson, it hasta be without neck binding.
Comment