banner

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Challenge! Wiring Diagram HSH

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Challenge! Wiring Diagram HSH

    ArtieToo and the other experienced diagram makers.... I’ve got a challenge for you. Full disclosure, I haven’t sat down and mapped it out on a computer or note pad, I’m just throwing it out as a challenge.

    ingredients:
    2 Duncan 4 Conductor Humbucker pickups
    1 Duncan Single Coil
    1 Super Switch 5-Way Switch
    1 DPDT Push Pull switch (tone)
    1 Pot (volume)

    Is this possible?

    P/P Down:
    -Bridge Humbucker full
    -Bridge/Neck Split Inner Coils
    -Bridge/Neck full, both (standard middle position on HH guitars)
    -Bridge/Neck Split Outer Coils
    -Neck Humbucker full

    P/P Up:
    -Bridge Split
    -Bridge Split and Middle Single Coil
    -Middle Single Coil
    -Neck Split and Middle Single Coil
    -Neck Split

    Basically with the push/pull down it functions as an HH, and with it up it functions like a Strat. We’ll cross the polarity bridge after we determine feasibility.

    Not interested in debating how a split bridge sounds, that a split Humbucker plus middle doesn’t sound like a Strat, that the outers won’t sound like a Telecaster or that there are too many options that don’t sound different enough. This is just a technical feasibility discussion.
    Oh no.....


    Oh Yeah!

  • #2
    I'm having trouble finding it via Forum Advanced Search, so I'll have to wait til I get back home later to look through my folder of paper drawings, but there was a very similar diagram last year that member Mike S (?) drew up that had the push-pull switching the function of position 3 like you want. Will get back to you a little later.
    Sanford: "The hardest part about tone chasing is losing the expectations associated with the hardware."

    Comment


    • #3
      This is pretty much what I'd like to do with a freeway switch the 10 way blade but it would be interesting to see how to do it with more common parts as well as some multi pole 5 ways can apparently have more options

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by vanlandau View Post
        This is pretty much what I'd like to do with a freeway switch the 10 way blade but it would be interesting to see how to do it with more common parts as well as some multi pole 5 ways can apparently have more options
        Which diagram are you using? I see they all do them split positions but the Humbucker side is different for all options.
        Oh no.....


        Oh Yeah!

        Comment


        • #5
          Looks like an interesting challenge. I'll look it over and doodle a couple things.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by ArtieToo View Post
            Looks like an interesting challenge. I'll look it over and doodle a couple things.
            The inner/outer positions are open for other options if there aren’t enough poles to make it all work.
            Oh no.....


            Oh Yeah!

            Comment


            • #7
              Found it.

              Here's the link:

              https://forum.seymourduncan.com/foru...ggestions-help

              Forum member MikeS provided a hand-drawn sketch of this scheme last year for another forum member, and he asked for someone to verify. I translated his sketch to a traditional layout and then verified the signal route for all 10 positions.

              I just need to look on my computer harddrive and check if i still have that diagram I created from Mike's sketch.

              Edit: i see that in non-SSS mode this scheme has Full HB + Middle instead of Split HB + Middle thay you requested. I'll take a look and see if it can be modded to do the splits in HB mode.
              Last edited by Jack_TriPpEr; 05-10-2021, 08:39 AM.
              Sanford: "The hardest part about tone chasing is losing the expectations associated with the hardware."

              Comment


              • #8
                After reviewing that scheme, yes, it can be modded so in non-SSS mode, the two humbuckers are autosplit in Positions 2 & 4. The Common lug of the pole in the top right of that diagram needs to get routed to Ground instead of the Push-Pull

                But Darkside, since you asked for Both Inners and Both Outers specifically in Pos 2 & 4, I need to know if you want each of those to be hum-canceling pairs or you don't care. If you want hum-canceling, i need to know if eithet humbucker will be a RWRP, or you're plannimg to flip the magnet in one of them (and which one), or if you're game for rotating one of the pups 180 degrees in its mounting ring as another way of getting the hum-canceling coils positioned to support what you want. Each option has impacts on how the wires from each humbucker is routed to the superswitch, so the diagram can't be finalized until you provide this further info.
                Sanford: "The hardest part about tone chasing is losing the expectations associated with the hardware."

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Jack_TriPpEr View Post
                  After reviewing that scheme, yes, it can be modded so in non-SSS mode, the two humbuckers are autosplit in Positions 2 & 4. The Common lug of the pole in the top right of that diagram needs to get routed to Ground instead of the Push-Pull

                  But Darkside, since you asked for Both Inners and Both Outers specifically in Pos 2 & 4, I need to know if you want each of those to be hum-canceling pairs or you don't care. If you want hum-canceling, i need to know if eithet humbucker will be a RWRP, or you're plannimg to flip the magnet in one of them (and which one), or if you're game for rotating one of the pups 180 degrees in its mounting ring as another way of getting the hum-canceling coils positioned to support what you want. Each option has impacts on how the wires from each humbucker is routed to the superswitch, so the diagram can't be finalized until you provide this further info.
                  I think (and I’m open to suggestions) that the optimal thing would be to flip a magnet so that inners and outers would be hum canceling and also provide the most tonal “difference”. (Slugs and screws instead of one of each). That would also make all 5 positions on the HH side hum cancelling.

                  That would mean the preferred coil to be split to on each Humbucker would have to change to keep him cancelling with the middle. So probably split to the screw on the neck and the slug on the bridge. This would also probably be preferable for the SSS mode as well, with a neck screw and bridge stud
                  used by themselves.

                  Does that all make sense?
                  Oh no.....


                  Oh Yeah!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Yep, I understand.

                    Tell us more about that Middle pup. Stack design or no? RWRP or no?
                    Sanford: "The hardest part about tone chasing is losing the expectations associated with the hardware."

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Jack_TriPpEr View Post
                      Yep, I understand.

                      Tell us more about that Middle pup. Stack design or no? RWRP or no?
                      Is an STK-S4 or STK-S4m feasible with splitting in the notch positions? I think all the poles are occupied so a standard SSL-1/APS-1 would probably be ideal. It could be ordered either way for compatibility. Same with the flipped mag humbucker, it could be the neck or bridge. (Thinking Custom Custom/APS-1/APH-1n, but it could just as easily work with JB/SSL-1/Jazz or Custom/SSL-1/59)

                      I’ve never designed a wiring scheme this complex, hence my request for help! Also, any limitations it might present. Right now I’ve got an Elite Stratocaster and the S-1 is cool, but I never really remember what those other options do. This one I’m proposing makes perfect sense in my head.

                      Thank you for digging into it!
                      Last edited by PFDarkside; 05-10-2021, 12:36 PM.
                      Oh no.....


                      Oh Yeah!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by PFDarkside View Post

                        Is an STK-S4 or STK-S4m feasible with splitting in the notch positions? I think all the poles are occupied so a standard SSL-1/APS-1 would probably be ideal. It could be ordered either way for compatibility. Same with the flipped mag humbucker, it could be the neck or bridge. (Thinking Custom Custom/APS-1/APH-1n, but it could just as easily work with JB/SSL-1/Jazz or Custom/SSL-1/59)

                        I’ve never designed a wiring scheme this complex, hence my request for help! Also, any limitations it might present. Right now I’ve got an Elite Stratocaster and the S-1 is cool, but I never really remember what those other options do. This one I’m proposing makes perfect sense in my head.

                        Thank you for digging into it!
                        The coils that are chosen to get hum-canceling Outer Coils and Inner Coils, are not compatible with the coils that need to be chosen to get hum-canceling with Neck HB split + Middle SC pup, and Bridge HB split + Middle SC pup. In the first scenario, you are choosing two coils of opposite magnetic polarity for Both Inners and Both Outers (in each case, 1 north coil and 1 south coil). But to get hum-canceling with a Middle Pup (which we'll assume is South magnetic polarity for example purposes), you need each humbucker split to coils of the *same* polarity (North in this case). So in order to fulfill your request, either you need to add a 2nd push-pull switch that you will operate in tandem w the 1st push-pull, or instead of using a push-pull (2PDT) at all, use an S1 push-push pot or some other 4PDT switch which has an extra pole to change one of the 2 coils to be split in one of the two modes. Or, if you don't want to do that, explore other design options, which you said you were open to doing.
                        Sanford: "The hardest part about tone chasing is losing the expectations associated with the hardware."

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          ... or, choose to "not sweat" lack of hum-caceling in one of the two modes.
                          Sanford: "The hardest part about tone chasing is losing the expectations associated with the hardware."

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Oh, sorry, meant to say earlier, you're welcome. I'm glad to try and help out. I love wiring challenges like this.
                            Sanford: "The hardest part about tone chasing is losing the expectations associated with the hardware."

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I drew up the configuration, but I think I see what you are saying. The switch will need to “reuse” the same split coils as inner or outer in one of the positions? I figured in 2, it would always split to “inners” and in 4 to “outers”, but only select the active pickups by the push pull position.

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	62DE5415-71D3-4269-8888-975E49450043.jpeg
Views:	291
Size:	45.3 KB
ID:	6079726
                              Oh no.....


                              Oh Yeah!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X