Artie
Peaveyologist
Why does the Lil 59 have polepieces instead of rails?
You made me think of something. They do Lil' versions of full size humbuckers. What if they did the opposite?
I wonder what a full size Cool Rails might be? :scratchch
Why does the Lil 59 have polepieces instead of rails?
i wonder how close the jazz rails would be to a fullsize cool rails
I'm in the camp that it's probably marketing. They don't want to have too many rail pickups, and most people who want rails want something hotter.
Or maybe we are thinking this the wrong way. Why does the Lil 59 have polepieces instead of rails?
Agreed, no reason you can't approach "vintage' winds with rail pickups. Bill Lawrence is rolling in his grave, LOL!
Is it going to yield a slightly different sound and response than a classic screw-slug design? Yes, to an extent.
But you can play around with a lot of other characteristics of the wind and construction to make up for that, as well.
BTW, reading more into the Jazz Rails, it specifically and continually makes the point that it is for high gain applications.
I wonder if anything about the BL design is proprietary. Or under some patent protection.
BTW, reading more into the Jazz Rails, it specifically and continually makes the point that it is for high gain applications.
I agree with both points. The screws in the lil 59 make it warmer. However Dimarzio achieve a similar thing with their blade designs. So IMO it comes down to the properties of materials and construction, not an inherent limitation.I'm in the camp that it's probably marketing. They don't want to have too many rail pickups, and most people who want rails want something hotter.
Or maybe we are thinking this the wrong way. Why does the Lil 59 have polepieces instead of rails?
I wonder if anything about the BL design is proprietary. Or under some patent protection.
BTW, reading more into the Jazz Rails, it specifically and continually makes the point that it is for high gain applications.
Yeah, it seems like SD offers both types of Rails. What is interesting to me are the adjectives used for current SD Rails models. All mention high gain, and all mention 'clarity'. Now go to the traditional PAF-type pages, and see words like 'warm', 'sweet', 'vintage'. 'dynamic', and 'smooth'. In the SD world, these seem to be the opposite to me. It is also what led me to believe that a pickup would have to be radically re-designed to look like a Rail pickup. (baseplate, bobbin size, rail) but sound like a PAF. Could it be done? Maybe I will send a message to MJ or Derek.
I don't think 'warm', 'sweet', or 'smooth' are good descriptors of pretty much any low output PAF bridge humbucker I've tried.![]()
Yeah, it seems like SD offers both types of Rails. What is interesting to me are the adjectives used for current SD Rails models. All mention high gain, and all mention 'clarity'. Now go to the traditional PAF-type pages, and see words like 'warm', 'sweet', 'vintage'. 'dynamic', and 'smooth'. In the SD world, these seem to be the opposite to me. It is also what led me to believe that a pickup would have to be radically re-designed to look like a Rail pickup. (baseplate, bobbin size, rail) but sound like a PAF. Could it be done? Maybe I will send a message to MJ or Derek.