A8 PG still too scratchy... Anyone tried an A8 in a SNS?

No, it keeps the same basic tone but bumps up output a bit and makes it fatter and less harsh.

A few questions popped up in my mins, I hope you can help...

What about the metal spacer? Do I add another one? Won't this affect the tone and how?

Also I'd like to know if the double thick magnet will make the sound more compressed?
 
A few questions popped up in my mins, I hope you can help...

What about the metal spacer? Do I add another one? Won't this affect the tone and how?

Also I'd like to know if the double thick magnet will make the sound more compressed?

Adding a metal spacer is optional. Duncan pickups that use double thick magnets only use 1. No, a double thick magnet won't add compression. The opennes of the vintage wind is maintained, with the positives that I explained earlier.
 
+1. The sonic character of a Pearly Gates is largely due to its higher Q factor, giving a narrower and sharp resonant peak. No mag swap can solve that.

does the jb have a similar higher q factor? ive always heard some similarity between the eq curve of those two pups
 
+1. The sonic character of a Pearly Gates is largely due to its higher Q factor, giving a narrower and sharp resonant peak. No mag swap can solve that.

Yeah I don't mind the Pearly Gates character it's just that the guitar's own upper "resonant peak" coincides with that of the PG's so it's a little much. It needs a bit of taming, that's all. I'm not against the PG's voicing. In fact, I really like its clarity and great note definition. The guitar also has a low frequency bump that gives the PG a lot of balls, while being absolutely not muddy at all.

I wired a resistor in parallel with the vol pot so the PG sees 350k ohms and I must say we're getting close. 250k loses too much sparkle.
 
does the jb have a similar higher q factor? ive always heard some similarity between the eq curve of those two pups

Hi Jeremy,
If memory serves me, no, the JB has not quite the same kind of narrow pointy resonant peak than the PG. But it has a resonant frequency typically located in the "lower upper mids", so to speak. Hence a similar "insistent" effect on our audition, in my understanding / IMHO. :-)
 
Yeah I don't mind the Pearly Gates character it's just that the guitar's own upper "resonant peak" coincides with that of the PG's so it's a little much. It needs a bit of taming, that's all. I'm not against the PG's voicing. In fact, I really like its clarity and great note definition. The guitar also has a low frequency bump that gives the PG a lot of balls, while being absolutely not muddy at all.

I wired a resistor in parallel with the vol pot so the PG sees 350k ohms and I must say we're getting close. 250k loses too much sparkle.

I certainly understand your approach, since I often tend to "tune" a wiring harness according to the guitar hosting it. Looks like your guitar wants a 300k vol pot. :-))

BTW, is your PG covered? Eddy currents due to covers are another simple way to mellow annoying prominent frequencies IME/IMHO - a "bad" cover has sometimes a good effect. :-)
 
There's a nickel cover on it now, so it should have little effect.
Still, I feel a brass cover would kill the sparkle more than the upper mid spike...
 
There's a nickel cover on it now, so it should have little effect.
Still, I feel a brass cover would kill the sparkle more than the upper mid spike...

FWIW, all "bad" covers are not created equal: some are thicker than others, with the related effect in terms of Foucault currents. Golden covers have their own influence too, as chrome covers - which add inductance to pickups and change their harmonics...

Reason why I admit to go by trial and error rather than by "known material". Then I measure resonant peaks with a lab rig and am often surprised by what I see or hear.

It's a bit the same with magnets: we have a lab teslameter here and I tend to base my choices on the measured magnetic field, rather than on the alloy supposed to compose a mag. And the results are sometimes surprising too.

Regarding what you asked about "metal spacers", a.k.a. pole shoes / keeper bars: like any part containing iron added to the circuit, a double thick keeper bar would slightly increase the inductance and eddy currents. But it would also introduce a risk of high pitched feedback due to mechanical vibrations...
 
Last edited:
"Scratch city"? Don't know that expression, sorry not native english here. Why the double thick magnet? Wouldn't it just bump the mid spike even more? Persuade me.

English is all I've ever spoken and I still don't have a clue what "scratch city" means so don't worry about it too much. But I also don't have a clue what a scratchy humbucker is, either. So many people use works to describe how a pickup sounds that have nothing to do with describing how it actually sounds that I don't even know where to begin when attempting to figure out all off these buzz words.
 
Last edited:
English is all I've ever spoken and I still don't have a clue what "scratch city" means so don't worry about it too much. But I also don't have a clue what a scratchy humbucker is, either. So many people use works to describe how a pickup sounds that have nothing to do with describing how it actually sounds that I don't even know where to begin when attempting to figure out all off these buzz words.

I have zero idea what a “clanky” pickup sounds like. Yet I see people describe a pickup with that word fairly often. Lol
 
For non-native-English speakers (or even speakers of the King's English), American idiom can be pretty obscure sometimes.

In the 19th and early 20th centuries many American cities became known for a certain characteristic.
New York City had many radio stations and came to be known as Radio City - there still is a Radio City Music Hall.
Schenectady, the home of General Electric, was called Electric City.
Even today Chicago is known as the Windy City.

Adding "city" or "town" became a common expression, meaning "home of" or "a place of."

flavor town = a place of good flavor
scratch city = where scratchy tone lives
 
Last edited:
I wanted to love a8 but the metal clang it introduced only became more noticeable as I kept playing with one, I think it’s only good in a pickup that deficient in those particular frequencies. I’m thinking that an alternate 8 would sound underwhelming with an A5 mag.
 
Back
Top