I've never played an Agile. The slight cutaway change and headstock really turns it off for me in the aesthetics department. I can't speak for anything else.
Then there's the Epiphone headstock which I find hideous on any Gibson-copy guitar. What also really bugs me is the Epiphone Les Paul Customs; those fretboards need to be ebony (ebony fretboards can easily be found on guitars in the same price range, or even lower) or at least dark/dyed rosewood.
I would be a lot more into Epiphones if their finishes weren't as thick (mostly due to feel, but that can be solved easily), they had a 'correct' looking headstock, had better and more consistent fretwork, and on the G400s if they had binding on the neck. I can easily get something the way I want price - to a little extra - if I were buy Gibson without having to do all the extra work. I can easily understand why others think differently though, and I'm just picky on how I want LPs and SGs to look.
I would prefer an Orville over an Epiphone though, especially if it is a Custom. It is easy enough to dye the fretboard to look like ebony, replace the electronics as usual here and then I'm fine with it. If it is an Edwards Les Paul Custom I'd just have to swap the electronics.
I do find this guitar attractive though, despite the amount of abalone on it. Possibly would darken the fretboard:
View attachment 45414