An "ah-hah" moment! (Strat S-S-S content)

doveman

New member
As I finished up my successful Lollar P-90 project, I made a clip involving all 5 of my guitars. I noticed that ... I didn't / couldn't use my G&L Legacy bridge. Like I usually do, I used the neck/mid notch and came up with something good. But it got me to thinking ... I never use my Strat-like guitars (Strat & G&L) bridge pickups and only rarely the bridge/mid notch. Maybe this P-90 like thing might be cool on a S-S-S guitar?

Well ... I didn't go that way ... realized I already have a P-90 guitar now. But I got to considering this $75 experiment and ended up putting a 9.5k Fralin in the bridge with really nice results. That allows me to raise both the neck and bridge pups closer to the strings ... which has made both pups fuller. It has opened up this S-S-S guitar without losing anything I was already using. Now the G&L uses a master-treble-bass control configuration that I happen to really like ... and that helps a lot. I set the bass at 5 - roll up towards 10 to thicken up any of the below mentioned tones.

Basically:
  • Bridge - Treble on 2-4 ... really great tone about 3/4 way to P-90s-ville and not very noisy
  • Bridge/Mid Notch - Treble 3-5 - Less quack but more overtones (more about this later)
  • Middle - Finally can use the middle - since it's closer to the strings - fuller than before
  • Neck/Mid Notch - Treble 4-10 - Same quack as before - but fuller - again closer to the strings
  • Neck - Treble 4-10 - Fuller - Closer to the strings
Now the "ah-hah" parts:

S-S-S were not always RWRP: I never knew that this came about in the 80s and that earlier Strats did not have the quack. I accidentally found (since Fralins and G&L have opposite RWRP settings) that there were some more overtones to my ear when mixing bridge/mid pickups that were not RWRP. A little searching here ... discovered that others had the same experience. It's not a bad sound even though there is more noise. I almost left the non-RWRP setting for my bridge/mid settings but I was curious and switched the neck and bridge pickups to try RWRP ... for me it worked better. But non-RWRP is a great option I had never considered.

Tone Control is the Key: Now I am firmly in the camp that lives on the tone controls. I disagree with those that just dime the tone or take it off. An amp set with a lot of treble ... combined with the tone knob is pure heaven. But on my Strat and G&L, I really did not take advantage of this ... when I toned down the treble, the bridge just didn't have enough kick. But without rolling it off it was brittle and harsh ... so I didn't use them often. But taking my 7.1k bridge to 9.5k gave it just enough of a bump so this works. I can finally balance that bridge pickup - tone and volume. Now that PTB control setup on the G&L makes this even better ... just add back a little treble as you head toward the neck pickups ... start bass on 5 and add bass if you want to thicken a little ... it feels perfect.

Quack: I like the current "quack" noiseless setup on Strat guitars BUT the option for the more overtones can be achieved by both non-RWRP configuration or one pickup being stronger than the other when RWRP. I get less quack with the 7.5k(b)/6.9k(m) RWRP than if they were more balanced AND more overtones (to my ear). These overtones are similar to the non-RWRP setup I mentioned earlier. Now if you want to "keep the quack" you can get a tapped bridge in the 7k range and tap the pickup when in the bridge/mid notch ... or even make it an option with push-pull. I for one, like the overtones/noiseless setup with the imbalanced 6.9k/9.5k RWRP setup.

Now, you guys probably knew all of this but WOW:eek5: for me. A $75 experiment that has transformed my G&L Legacy ... the other half of the guitar has opened up.

Just felt like sharing this ... :wave:
 
Re: An "ah-hah" moment! (Strat S-S-S content)

S-S-S were not always RWRP: I never knew that this came about in the 80s and that earlier Strats did not have the quack. I accidentally found (since Fralins and G&L have opposite RWRP settings) that there were some more overtones to my ear when mixing bridge/mid pickups that were not RWRP.

I hesitate to comment here because I'm not really up on the whole "vintage" thang, but I don't think that RW/RP has any affect on "quack". It only affects noise. The strings and the pup don't know that one pup is RW/RP. The "desired" signal that comes out is exactly identical to a non-rw/rp pup. Remember, you reverse the phase twice in an rw/rp pup, bringing everything back to "normal".

Could it be the difference in pups, rather than the wind-direction, that you're hearing?
 
Re: An "ah-hah" moment! (Strat S-S-S content)

I hesitate to comment here because I'm not really up on the whole "vintage" thang, but I don't think that RW/RP has any affect on "quack". It only affects noise. The strings and the pup don't know that one pup is RW/RP. The "desired" signal that comes out is exactly identical to a non-rw/rp pup. Remember, you reverse the phase twice in an rw/rp pup, bringing everything back to "normal". Could it be the difference in pups, rather than the wind-direction, that you're hearing?

Maybe you're right ... I can tell you that neither configuration (with the new pickup) had as much quack and seemed to have more overtones ... seemed a good thing for me ... although this same perception would be bad news for someone who needed the quack. I read about this theory here ... tones being different without the RWRP. I'd like to know more ... I find it interesting. Maybe others can add to the info.

May I ask in what guitar did you use the Lollar P90?

A Washburn WI66 Gold Top ... it turned out great. Here's the link for the project threads.

The Lollars Project & The Gold Top Project
 
Last edited:
Re: An "ah-hah" moment! (Strat S-S-S content)

at this came about in the 80s and that earlier Strats did not have the quack. I accidentally found (since Fralins and G&L have opposite RWRP settings) that there were some more overtones to my ear when mixing bridge/mid pickups that were not RWRP. A little searching here ... discovered that others had the same experience. It's not a bad sound even though there is more noise. I almost left the non-RWRP setting for my bridge/mid settings but I was curious and switched the neck and bridge pickups to try RWRP ... for me it worked better. But non-RWRP is a great option I had never considered.

[ :

I hesitate to comment here because I'm not really up on the whole "vintage" thang, but I don't think that RW/RP has any affect on "quack". It only affects noise. The strings and the pup don't know that one pup is RW/RP. The "desired" signal that comes out is exactly identical to a non-rw/rp pup. Remember, you reverse the phase twice in an rw/rp pup, bringing everything back to "normal".

As far as I know RW/RP doesn't affect tone. :)

I believe the thing doveman is speaking of with older vintage Strats is the 3-way switch....the "notch" positions weren't there. You could still get the tones if you could "cheat" the switch by getting it to stick between positions.
 
Re: An "ah-hah" moment! (Strat S-S-S content)

As far as I know RW/RP doesn't affect tone. :)

I believe the thing doveman is speaking of with older vintage Strats is the 3-way switch....the "notch" positions weren't there. You could still get the tones if you could "cheat" the switch by getting it to stick between positions.

Did the originals quack in the notch positions in the original non-RWRP? I may have misunderstood what I read. I know the tones are different in my configuration ... reduced quack too. But like ArtieToo said ... that might be imbalance in output.
 
Re: An "ah-hah" moment! (Strat S-S-S content)

Did the originals quack in the notch positions in the original non-RWRP? I may have misunderstood what I read. I know the tones are different in my configuration ... reduced quack too. But like ArtieToo said ... that might be imbalance in output.

You bet! Everyone is trying to capture the quack of vintage Strats (myself included) and I think trying to match outputs is the wrong way to go.

Most vintage Strat pups were wound by hand and were not matched at all. I use a weaker pup in the middle position myself, something like 5.9K and have it set fairly low to give maximum quack and cluck.

Adjusting the height of the pups will have an effect as well.
 
Re: An "ah-hah" moment! (Strat S-S-S content)

This is an example of the thing I was talking about ... says in here that Bare Knuckles site has it in the FAQs section. I don't know ... I'm probably all wet ... but mine had a difference that I really liked ... and it very well may be the imbalance in pickup strength. I'm thankful for it ... whatever it is.

https://forum.seymourduncan.com/showthread.php?t=104626

But I find this discussion interesting.
 
Last edited:
Re: An "ah-hah" moment! (Strat S-S-S content)

I had 8 Les Pauls in the past ... but that doesn't make me a bad person ... :onder: or does it?
 
Re: An "ah-hah" moment! (Strat S-S-S content)

Here's the quote from the Bare Knuckles site that I mentioned at Bare Knuckles FAQs click on the 4th item ...

Stock vs RWRP middle single coils. A stock middle coil will have more mid range on the in between positions of the 5 way selector and not be hum canceling.You'll also notice marginally more volume across the whole set of 3 coils.Fender Strats originally came with 3 stock wound/polarity coils. RWRP middle coil will hum cancel in positions 2 and 4 of the 5 way selector, arguably more versatile than a stock middle coil and popularized by players like Mark Knopfler and Eric Johnson.

Sounds like what I was describing earlier ...
 
Re: An "ah-hah" moment! (Strat S-S-S content)

There's a fair amount of misunderstanding in the SD thread thats linked above, and apparently, the Bare Knuckles folks don't get it either. There's no difference in the signal generated by an RW/RP pup. The signal isn't out-of-phase. Thats the whole point of reversing both the wind direction and the magnets. There's no logical reason for a non-rwrp pup to have more midrange. If anything, it would have to do with the two pups not being wound identical. We know how a subtle a difference in sound two pickups can have.

And besides all that, all the Strats I've heard, that have RW/RP middles, have excellent "quack" and jangle in the notch positions. Its the nature of the beast.
 
Re: An "ah-hah" moment! (Strat S-S-S content)

So my thicker tone and less quack in the (9.5k bridge)/(6.9k mid) notch is likely the effect of the larger difference in the pickups. If you did want to "keep the quack", you could tap the bridge. That makes sense ... and while this configuration won't work for everyone, I'm really liking it.

You can see the reason that I was leaning this way after searching here. Interesting discussion for sure.
 
Back
Top