Also about the nut, is it true its hard to to keep the guitar in tune? Or is it just internet myth?
Angled nut slots cause the string to bind at the nut, which affects tuning stability. The material is inconsequential. I had a Graphtec nut on my LP Standard and the tuning would slip on the G. I was using 9s so it's not like they were too big.
Also, as others mentioned, why not a have a completely traditional series, a transitional series, and a modern series?
...different from what..?
Look at the headstock. See how the strings fan outward to the tuners from the nut, and yet are straight going along the neck? They angle at the nut. This is where they bind.
You're not likely to find a Gibson with straight string pull, at least not a Les Paul.
...different from what..?
Look at the headstock. See how the strings fan outward to the tuners from the nut, and yet are straight going along the neck? They angle at the nut. This is where they bind.
You're not likely to find a Gibson with straight string pull, at least not a Les Paul.
Good idea. What were they thinking with the wide neck? I have never heard one person say to me that they wish their LP had a wider neck?? I personally didnt mind it to much, but i really dont get it.
As I posted in the other thread, they are already offering 2015s with standard tuners, necks and nuts
I couldn't agree more. A Les Paul Standard should be nothing more than the tried and true formula - traditional neck, pick-up configuration and controls. Gibson could offer a choice of a 50's or 60's neck. Let them experiment with other models, but a standard should not have any new bells and whistles.