verbotenco
New member
Re: Body wood: Alder vs Mahogany for hard rock & metal?
What I infer from your long and laborious posting is that, there is no need to be too picky or too high almighty that one feels he or she can only be satisfied with Gibson LP or Suhr or any other pricey guitars out there. Rather, simply go for a decent guitar moderately priced and tweak the pickup, amp, pedal, every other factor in the sound chain basically, and voila...you are in tone heaven.
I simply promote this notion because tonal differences between solid bodies has been hyped so much to the point that people go on a proverbial tone chase for eternity when guitars with the same exact hardware and pickups but different bodies/necks (not hollows) could easily fool any listener. The quality of assembly is even more important than the quality difference between parts made of the same material.
If you put thought into your music and use your gear well, it isn't impossible to emulate many popular recorded sounds using a versatile strat/tele/lp and a good amp with some good quality pedals if needed. I doubt that any of those 3 guitars (if not a total POS runt anomaly from an assembly line) would fail at getting an appropriate rock/blues/jazz/r&b/funk/pop even metal tone with a good player behind the axe, tones in the ballpark of classic recordings when you're using the right gear and mixing it well.
It's not like Jimmy page's LP's and Teles were made from some legendary wood or what not, he just knew how to get the sounds he wanted and the ideas were contagious so they became legendary to us.
What I infer from your long and laborious posting is that, there is no need to be too picky or too high almighty that one feels he or she can only be satisfied with Gibson LP or Suhr or any other pricey guitars out there. Rather, simply go for a decent guitar moderately priced and tweak the pickup, amp, pedal, every other factor in the sound chain basically, and voila...you are in tone heaven.