Bridge humbucker like a PAF Pro but with more bass?

superblues

New member
Tl;dr: Please recommend a f-spaced bridge pickup similar to a PAF Pro but with more bass output.

The (really) long version: I'm new to this forum but I've been lurking and reading for months. I've done countless searches using the forum search and Google search, but I can't quite find what I'm looking for. I've listened and listened and listened to every YouTube clip and pickup comparison I can find, but I'm still at a loss. I was hoping your collective wisdom could point me in the right direction.

I'm trying to find a suitable replacement for an older PAF Pro in the bridge position of an early 90s alder Musicman Silhouette HSS. The guitar is a string-thru hard tail, 25.5", rosewood FB, maple neck, swimming pool rout. The string spacing at the bridge is nearly 55 mm across, so I STRONGLY prefer f-spaced replacements. I cannot tell if the pots are 250k or 500k by direct observation. They appear original, and the mfr markings are mostly covered in solder and flux. The singles are Dimarzio "Customs" that sound clean without being sterile, generic with somewhat low output, even for singles. This guitar seems to be relatively bass shy and I don't help things by stringing 10-46. I like the clarity and present mids of the PAF Pro, but in this guitar, the bass is seriously lacking.

I favor blackface and tweed combos, generally played clean or with a liberal amount of overdrive. I do not use processors or pedals other than the occasional delay. I tend to use the neck and bridge together or just the bridge for strummed rhythms, neck or neck and bridge for knopfler-esque finger-picking. The middle pickup alone and positions 2 and 4 are never used. I like the lower, PAF-level output because I like mellow, sparkly cleans and I like the bridge H to balance with a neck S. I will likely never split the H, and I would greatly prefer not to swap mags. I play rhythm guitar exclusively, favoring classic rock, blues rock, grunge, garage, and indie. I couldn't tell you how many years it's been since I played a lead.

I have already tried a 59b, set to the identical pickup height as the PAF Pro before it. The output levels are comparable, and the bass response of the 59b is perfect. The clean tone clarity and sparkle are great. The bass adds just the right amount of oomph to the cleans. The problem is the mids. Where there was once warm, singing mids with moderate tweed distortion, now is a hollow, empty "fizzy" sizzle. It sounds like that hollow metallic sizzle you hear when you put your ear up to the opening of a freshly opened can of soda. With distortion, the 59b sounded like I had kicked on a mild fuzz pedal, not at all what I was going for. I knew the 59's mids were scooped, but I had hoped they wouldn't be scooped this much.

I have heavily researched the PGb, 59/c, JB, C/C5/CC, WLH, Air Zone, and Air Classic. The JB has waaaay more output than I want and is more congested and nasal in the upper mids than I like. The 59/c sounds like a nice compromise, but I'm not convinced it has the warmth in the lows or low mids. I'm concerned the PG's highs are too forward. The WLH does not appear to be available in trem spacing.

So my question, which pickup has both the bass and clarity of a 59b and also the warmth and slight push in the midrange of the PAF Pro?

Thank you in advance for your help and suggestions.
 
Re: Bridge humbucker like a PAF Pro but with more bass?

The Whole Lotta Humuckers are Duncan's big midrange PAFs. They might be available Trem-spaced as a shop floor custom.
 
Re: Bridge humbucker like a PAF Pro but with more bass?

I could make an argument for an A2P - it has bass AND mids. But it isn't really like a PAF Pro at all.
 
Re: Bridge humbucker like a PAF Pro but with more bass?

I would pile on the WLH bandwagon and you can get them trem spaced on EBay, or I would throw out the Dimarzio 36th anniversary Bridge model (DP223). I've never played a PAF Pro so I can't compare directly, but to me it has great mids and a good punchy deep bass (not quite as much as a 59 however) and smooth bright highs. It won't overpower your single coils either.
 
Re: Bridge humbucker like a PAF Pro but with more bass?

If you can find a Dimarzio Double Whammy it's like a higher output PAF Pro with more bass. I think it was replaced by the Steve's Special?
 
Last edited:
Re: Bridge humbucker like a PAF Pro but with more bass?

The Whole Lotta Humuckers are Duncan's big midrange PAFs. They might be available Trem-spaced as a shop floor custom.

What is a shop floor custom and what is the process for getting one?
 
Re: Bridge humbucker like a PAF Pro but with more bass?

You can contact the Custom Shop (above) or even have your retailer put in an order directly. You might also like the 59/Custom Hybrid, which is a little hotter than the WLH, but also a great sounding pickup for rock rhythms.
 
Re: Bridge humbucker like a PAF Pro but with more bass?

Whole Lotta Bridge- more bass than a PAF Pro ????? Nope.

The Screaming Demon comes to mind. It has more bass than a 59b, and has scooped mids, but isn't fuzzy like the 59b with a lot of gain.
The other pickup that reminds me of what you describe is the Breed bridge.
 
Re: Bridge humbucker like a PAF Pro but with more bass?

How about the PB?

Sent from my MotoE2(4G-LTE) using Tapatalk
 
Re: Bridge humbucker like a PAF Pro but with more bass?

You might also like the 59/Custom Hybrid, which is a little hotter than the WLH, but also a great sounding pickup for rock rhythms.

I'm inclined to wholeheartedly agree with the great Mincer here.

Kudos to the OP for such a excellently descriptive post... FWIW, "Putting your head up to the freshly opened can of soda" is I think what we refer to as "crushed glass"... it's a crispness and relies on a big midrange scoop for that percussive (sort-of-effervescent) excited frequency band(s).
 
Re: Bridge humbucker like a PAF Pro but with more bass?

If you're keen on the PAF Pro, try replacing the bass sides hex screws with flat head screws, experiment with the placements.
 
Re: Bridge humbucker like a PAF Pro but with more bass?

Thank you all for the suggestions. I've played with the heights of the pickup and polepieces, trying to find a more balanced tone. I'm finding ways to make the 59b work for me, but I'm basically having to crank the mids at the amp to get the fullness I'm looking for. I had originally dismissed the JB as too congested, but I'm wondering if I was being too rash after relistening to clips. It seems to have more fullness in the low mids than anything else in Duncan's lineup.

I absolutely love the WLH set in LPs, but I'm more and more convinced that my Silhouette has special needs in the low end and mids that a WLH won't solve.

I've also been warming up to the idea of swapping the mag in my 59b after finding the quote below. So which one do I want, A2, A4, UOA5, A8? How radical of a change will a mag swap be? Do mag swaps give you two different shades of the same pickup or are the results more like two different pickups?


The '59 wind is so good as you can use ANY magnet you want without making it sound bad, not even on purpose.

Every magnet swap serves to taylor-made your particular needs in your particular guitar/rig. Too scooped? Get an A4 and you're done. Too boomy? Get an A3 and you're done. Too cold and sterile? Get an A2 and you're done. Too wimpy? Get an A8 and you're done. Too bold with an A8? Get an UOA5 and you're done.

That's the beauty of the '59 wind... you just can't fault it! ;)
 
Last edited:
Re: Bridge humbucker like a PAF Pro but with more bass?

A 59/C with an UOA5 is a wonderful thing!
 
Re: Bridge humbucker like a PAF Pro but with more bass?

Why did no one bring up the PATB-3? Not as scooped as the 59 and much more clear bass.
 
Back
Top