STRATDELUXER97
Stratoblaster Tone Meister
Re: British or American
Jeremy I agree...The biggest dilemma with the early Marshall sound,was that you had to crank the amp(s) to 10 to get the "God" tone!
My tones are all about that early tone,but it's kind of simulated through the use of external effects to approximate it..Funny thing is,I use an early NMV 50 watt Marshall head and I'm forced to still use an overdrive or distortion effect to get that cranked up tone...The attenuators I tryed seemed to kill the tone of my amp.
On the other hand,the BF Fender clean tone is a great platform to build on,simply because the amp is warm,round,and the mids are scooped back a bit.This style amp(in my case)is a great amp to take well to pedals...The 59 Bassman circuit works well,but I don't care for it's clean tones as much as I do with the BF Fender series..To me the 59 Bassman and the early Marshall tones are pretty similar and so I find I favor the BF Fender tones.
i love my american tones. tweeds, browns and blacks.
i havent owned a marshall for a year or two and i dont miss it
Jeremy I agree...The biggest dilemma with the early Marshall sound,was that you had to crank the amp(s) to 10 to get the "God" tone!
My tones are all about that early tone,but it's kind of simulated through the use of external effects to approximate it..Funny thing is,I use an early NMV 50 watt Marshall head and I'm forced to still use an overdrive or distortion effect to get that cranked up tone...The attenuators I tryed seemed to kill the tone of my amp.
On the other hand,the BF Fender clean tone is a great platform to build on,simply because the amp is warm,round,and the mids are scooped back a bit.This style amp(in my case)is a great amp to take well to pedals...The 59 Bassman circuit works well,but I don't care for it's clean tones as much as I do with the BF Fender series..To me the 59 Bassman and the early Marshall tones are pretty similar and so I find I favor the BF Fender tones.
Last edited: