KLINKDETROIT
New member
Re: C5 With More Mids. How? Custom Shop?, Other?
Actually the distortion was the first pup I tried and it was a litttle too hot. But much thanks though. If ya ever want to check out any of my setup you are welcome to. I am probably headed to the loft at some point today actually. I am going to swap the C5 for a PATB1 in the goldtop and try some foam and thicker guage speaker wire in my cab.
I think the fact that my mids were cranked live works but all my friends like their mids scooped and with the C5 + scooped mids on Marshalls it was very dark and thin. Hey isnt that what Michael Jacksons accuser said? LOL
Robert S. said:I don't know Rob, I heard you guys play at the 89X party and your tone was far from lacking and I definately didn't hear anything that came close to sounding thin but you may have played the Schecter more that evening.
If you like the EMG 85/500t thing I do have a Duncan Distortion set laying around that you could try out. The DD in the bridge will definately get you more juice and mids.
I was noticing a simular thing with my C-5 using the Recto channel on my Mesa rig. It sounded killer through the other channels and through my Marshall but the Recto voicing is a bit different and I did find it too thin for some things. Just out of curiosity I swapped magnets and started trying the CC. Then yesterday in my knob spinning haze to find a fatter tone for one of the bands I'm working with I dailed the drive to zero and dimed the gain on the recto channel. I lost a lot of the edge in my tone and the lower mids and mids shot through the roof. It still cuts and sounds very agressive but it's more of a cranked and pedalled master volume amp tone than a cascaded and driven tone. Running the amp that way seems to allow the highs and mids when pushed up to add gain to the signal instead of the drive.
While i know the Triaxis/2:90 is a bit different from your modded Recto head, it's worth a try. Right now I have the gain at 10, treble at 6, mids at 7, bass at 4.5 and the lead drive at zero. I also have the presence at 3 oclock on the 2:90 which takes some of the top end and urgency off of the tone. With these settings the C-5 may actually be a better choice for me over the CC as my tone is now very thick with a good dose of bite on the top end for lead work.
I'm going to run an Antiquity set and a JP set through the amp today and see how it holds up to a brighter set of pickups before i switch the magnets back again.
Actually the distortion was the first pup I tried and it was a litttle too hot. But much thanks though. If ya ever want to check out any of my setup you are welcome to. I am probably headed to the loft at some point today actually. I am going to swap the C5 for a PATB1 in the goldtop and try some foam and thicker guage speaker wire in my cab.
I think the fact that my mids were cranked live works but all my friends like their mids scooped and with the C5 + scooped mids on Marshalls it was very dark and thin. Hey isnt that what Michael Jacksons accuser said? LOL