andybowers
New member
I have left a message with alex at sd, about replacing my gibson les paul classic pickups. I thought i'd ask for a few opinions around here
After a rehearsal the other day, the first with my new les paul i totally decided that the gibson 500t/496r do not suit my playing style.
The problems i found with the gibson pickups are:
output, way too hot for me
eq, 500t too trebley getting near harsh with my setup
496r muddy and a little unresonsive
overall dont quite sound as nice as my other seymour loaded guitars
See these may work ok with a vintage marshall head but not with my laney gh100l.
What i'd like is a cross between a little 59' in my tele (heavy ash), original parallel axis in my frankenstrat style guitar (basswood)and something a little less bright than the jb in my yamaha pac usa2. The eq curves and outputs are nearly correct in those guitars
I like the alnico pro2 humbucker in the neck in my tele (with 250k pots) great for smooth singing liquidy tone for me, its either that or a 59' in my les paul neck.
What could you suggest?
Many Thanks
Andy
After a rehearsal the other day, the first with my new les paul i totally decided that the gibson 500t/496r do not suit my playing style.
The problems i found with the gibson pickups are:
output, way too hot for me
eq, 500t too trebley getting near harsh with my setup
496r muddy and a little unresonsive
overall dont quite sound as nice as my other seymour loaded guitars
See these may work ok with a vintage marshall head but not with my laney gh100l.
What i'd like is a cross between a little 59' in my tele (heavy ash), original parallel axis in my frankenstrat style guitar (basswood)and something a little less bright than the jb in my yamaha pac usa2. The eq curves and outputs are nearly correct in those guitars
I like the alnico pro2 humbucker in the neck in my tele (with 250k pots) great for smooth singing liquidy tone for me, its either that or a 59' in my les paul neck.
What could you suggest?
Many Thanks
Andy