First I have to say I do not own any counterfeit guitars, and I don’t wish to implicate anyone I know.
However, suppose hypothetically that I know a person that plays in bars and assorted outdoor venues. This person may own some fine instruments that have not only cash value, but in many cases sentimental and emotional value. This guy may not wish to expose his better guitars to possible theft and or damage that is a fact of life for working musicians. Lest say this guy bought a Chibson and upgraded it to his requirements, maybe he has parstcasters with non-Fender parts, but perhaps a Fender waterslide decal on the headstock. These guitars serve two purposes, they protect his investment in his good guitars, and they provide his band with a professional image. People on this board would perhaps spot these guitars, but 90% of bar folks just see name brand guitars. In my eyes, everyone wins. He uses tools for his job that appear to be the industry standard, thus he and his band are winners. The two big name guitar companies win by having people think they are seeing their products being used professionally. Anyone playing in bars and dragging around three thousand dollar Les Pauls and thousand dollar Strats to bars and festivals is going to end up with a horror story at some point. Guitars get knocked over, they get stolen, and **** falls on them. If this is part of Aces thought process I’d call it smart thinking.