ExplorersRock
X-Files Duckbucker
So I was peaking around Warmoth's website and I noticed that on the carved top guitars, they now say "Double Lam Top Required" when you get to the step where you choose your wood. They have a notice on the page that states:
Being the curious guy I am, I called up Warmoth and asked, "What's up with this? Is this recent?" The rep was very straightforward and stated that this has only been going on for a few months and it is a way of keeping costs down because the cost of exotic woods continues to rise. Also, using a thinner figure laminate allows them to do some interesting stuff with some of the carved tops that they couldn't do before. We chatted a bit more and they are interested in keeping the tone, but with regards to the figure, you can't see it under the paint or binding so saving money by going with the veneer seemed to make sense.
I'll admit, part of me wants to start going, "but, but, but..." However, I gotta admit that I see the point, and since they are being upfront and honest about it, I have no objections. If they weren't admitting it or were not offering a 3/4" total maple cap, I would not be pleased. But I think this is a reasonable way to allow us enthusiasts (a.k.a. nerds) that want to build our own to do so without going broke. But what do you guys think?
Double Laminate Tops
DL Tops are made from two pieces of wood: a figured 1/16" thick top-laminate and a non-figured sub-laminate. Together they are ¾" thick. In the selections above the wood before the slash is the figured top laminate (the wood that will show). The wood after the slash is the sub-laminate (the wood that will not show).
Being the curious guy I am, I called up Warmoth and asked, "What's up with this? Is this recent?" The rep was very straightforward and stated that this has only been going on for a few months and it is a way of keeping costs down because the cost of exotic woods continues to rise. Also, using a thinner figure laminate allows them to do some interesting stuff with some of the carved tops that they couldn't do before. We chatted a bit more and they are interested in keeping the tone, but with regards to the figure, you can't see it under the paint or binding so saving money by going with the veneer seemed to make sense.
I'll admit, part of me wants to start going, "but, but, but..." However, I gotta admit that I see the point, and since they are being upfront and honest about it, I have no objections. If they weren't admitting it or were not offering a 3/4" total maple cap, I would not be pleased. But I think this is a reasonable way to allow us enthusiasts (a.k.a. nerds) that want to build our own to do so without going broke. But what do you guys think?
Last edited: