Re: Difference between honduran and african mahogany?
Yes, but there are as many opinions as there are trees. Here's what I understand generally.
Honduran mahogany is a lighter, more porus wood. Throughout the entire lenght of the tree light pieces of wood suitable for guitar manufacturing can be found, although generally speaking the pieces higher up in the tree are the most desireable, as the wood lower in the trunk compresses and becomes more dense to support the weight of the tree as it grows taller. Some people claim that trees that grow closer to the water are the most desireable, although I don't know how you would ever test that theory. Also, the same as woods in North America, old growth Honduran Mahogany is said to be superior to newer planted/reclaimed wood. Trees that grow in more dense growing conditions grow slower, and have more growth rings per square inch than those that grow faster. This is said to be more toneful.
African Mahogany is a much denser, heavier, wetter wood. It also, generally, tends to have higher mineral content than Honduran mahogany. It can still produce nice light pieces of wood, but these are fewer and farther between, and usually only found in the very highest parts of the trees. Since tree's are thinner at the top than at the bottom, only a select few pieces from high up will be of sufficent size to make a guitar after cutting and planing.
You can debate the tonal differences all you want, and no one would ever be right. The original 57-60 Les Pauls were built with Honduran Mahogany, and you know how people feel about the tone of those guitars. I think as much has to do with them being 50 years old, and being cut from old growth wood. However, given the choice, I would shoose Honduran every time. Tradition, brainwashing....who knows, but that's what I would choose.