Re: do non musicians like "reliced" or just old guitars?
Vintage cars go for much more if they are in good shape. From aging humbucker pickups and "closet" scratches to kool aid stains even "closet" which means faded spots and some scratches.
+1. The reason manufacturers
LOVE relic'd guitars is that it eliminates most of their 2nd's. That's a huge savings for them. All those guitars that had to be offloaded cheap from color inconsistencies, blemishes, rust, and damage from mishanding in the warehouse, can now be sold at full price. Ingenious! They don't have to be
nearly as careful in production, and they've significantly reduced the need for quality control. Screw up the color or finish, gouge a guitar? No problem, it'll go to the relic department to get beat up some more. And the chumps will pay
extra for it!
Every manufacturer would love to be able to do this. Cars, TV's, furniture, etc. Instead of selling that stuff at a big discount, they can sell it retail and say:
"Those scratches and dents are part of our patented relic process sir, and they'll cost you an extra $300." How many people want to buy a new car that looks like it's been in a demolition derby, or a couch with stains and tears that looks like it came from a garage sale?
"See that yellow spot on the carpet? That's real urine. Yep, I paid a $100 for that option." Some guitar makers have taken advantage of people who want to pretend they have vintage instruments. The obsession with old guitars has gotten to the point that fake 'wear' from sandpaper and shop tools is considered desirable in order to live out the fantasy. Sad commentary on the virtual world we live in. Can you see an orchestral musician buying a new instrument that some $10/hour employee 'aged' with sandpaper and a screwdriver? Are guitarists not as intelligent?