Re: do non musicians like "reliced" or just old guitars?
Would I like to have a 50-60's Telecaster of course I would. But when I compare an old Tele to a new one there the newer guitar wins hands down. The 3 saddle bridge on the old Teles don't allow for individual string intonation. We all know how important intonation is to tone. Newer Teles have staggered height locking tuners and resistance free LSR nuts. All adding to the tone and tuning stability of the guitar. I am sure if you could put a 2013 Telecaster in a time machine and put it the hands of Roy Buchanan he would be blown away.
This is my exact feeling on the subject. We live in a time period where ANYTHING you can possibly dream of as far as PERFECT gear goes is completely possible. You can get anything you want, from vintage, to replica, to modern, to space age. If you want it, your pocket book is the only issue.
Purists naturally want to like what the old pioneers wanted years ago. Forward thinking guitar players want what has never been possible. Anything is possible nowadays, from then till now. Now, it's a matter of choice, and what you want to spend your money on.
I find it funny when old gear ho's choose their new tour gear. It can run anywhere between what their first guitar and amp was all the way to whatever is now available. With the oldsters, their gear is probably being auctioned off nowadays, while they're onto something new. Then, you've got the young guy's buying that old gear, while they buy the new stuff.
My own preference is for classics that defined an era, and picking up mint museum examples of it. I've gone through a lot of gear, and that's what I dig at this point in the game. Rather than posing with relics, or buying new Chinese and Mexican crap, my favorite thing is finding definitive vintage gear that's in perfect cosmetic condition, restoring it functionally to brand new condition, and using it daily. We all have our preferences, and that's mine.