Howdy,
Have you guys ever seen the experiment where people are given what they are told is cheap wine and steak with cheap looking labels and presentation, hate it and then fed what they are told much nicer wine and steak with high shelf label designs and presentation etc and love it but it was a double blind test with the food actually being EXACTLY THE SAME? Back to back, same sitting, massive perception difference.
While the Duncan 59's in a Les Paul are killer... it seems there are perceived "better" options. Is this a bit like the wine market, perhaps? Do they have legitimate reasons they are better or is it like the wine double blind where a more expensive label and presentation make the perceived experience better?
Can anyone speak to the quality of the Duncan PAF style designs vs the "boutique"? It sounds like Duncan has the "magic old Gibson PAF winding machines" that companies like Throbak and PRS are touting as their "secret sauce" for the perfect PAF tone. Does duncan use vintage accurate bobbins? It sounds like the wire, winding machines and a few other details are all there in the stock Duncan 59 and we can just throw in our favorite magnet for personalized flavor?
Do Throbak, WCF, Wolfetone, Sheptone, Holmes and others I'm surely forgetting have construction details that production Duncans are missing or is it more in the "secret sauce" of the pixie dust they sprinkle on their wind design?
For example: The Fralin Pure Paf is very much a clean, low output, potted PAF with an Alnico 4. Would the A2P or 59 with A4 mags get really damn close to his special sound with perhaps a slightly different wind pattern designed by Duncan's ears instead of Fralin's and that's the only major difference?
Have you guys ever seen the experiment where people are given what they are told is cheap wine and steak with cheap looking labels and presentation, hate it and then fed what they are told much nicer wine and steak with high shelf label designs and presentation etc and love it but it was a double blind test with the food actually being EXACTLY THE SAME? Back to back, same sitting, massive perception difference.
While the Duncan 59's in a Les Paul are killer... it seems there are perceived "better" options. Is this a bit like the wine market, perhaps? Do they have legitimate reasons they are better or is it like the wine double blind where a more expensive label and presentation make the perceived experience better?
Can anyone speak to the quality of the Duncan PAF style designs vs the "boutique"? It sounds like Duncan has the "magic old Gibson PAF winding machines" that companies like Throbak and PRS are touting as their "secret sauce" for the perfect PAF tone. Does duncan use vintage accurate bobbins? It sounds like the wire, winding machines and a few other details are all there in the stock Duncan 59 and we can just throw in our favorite magnet for personalized flavor?
Do Throbak, WCF, Wolfetone, Sheptone, Holmes and others I'm surely forgetting have construction details that production Duncans are missing or is it more in the "secret sauce" of the pixie dust they sprinkle on their wind design?
For example: The Fralin Pure Paf is very much a clean, low output, potted PAF with an Alnico 4. Would the A2P or 59 with A4 mags get really damn close to his special sound with perhaps a slightly different wind pattern designed by Duncan's ears instead of Fralin's and that's the only major difference?
Last edited: