Brian Griffin
New member
Re: Every been tempted to just settle for one high-end guitar?
Absolutely not. A guitar is like woman, can't live with only one.
Absolutely not. A guitar is like woman, can't live with only one.
You're basically saying "If you ever have to wear somebody else's glasses and they have a different prescription than you, everything will look blurry!"
And they're saying "Why would I ever have to do that??"
Someone on this board recounted a story about Slash having the chance to play EVH's guitar and rig once. His conclusion - "I still sound like Slash."
Sure, the guitar and the wood (and the strings and pickups and air temperature and humidity and color of the stage lighting) all affect your tone. The point is that you won't sound like Slash just because you use the same gear he does. You will sound like yourself trying to sound like Slash.
No, he was saying that his technique is so superior that even if he only ever plays one guitar, someone could hand him a rusty old beater and he'd have no problem because, after all, he plays bass guitar and it has higher action than any beater. It doesn't work that way.
Slash sounds like himself playing EVH gear cause he plays the notes he would play. If he plays Eruption note-to-note using Eddie's gear, applying the same exact whammy-bar tricks and all, and record it, you wouldn't be able to tell.
Maybe your technique is just inferior to everyone else's.
The funny thing is that you accused me of "seeking argument" in another thread, and here you are doing your best to fan the flames.
yea, pretty much. It's like some crazy thought experiment; "will a person with nothing to gain and no real reason to continue the fight choose to walk away or jump on the bait?" I haven't even been trying or thinking very hard.
I'm starting to feel bad about it though. Would you calm down if I said You Win?
I had trouble switching guitars back in the day. I sold a Strat partly because I couldn't get on with its string spacing.Over the past 5 years, I've been playing a goodly bit with a very narrow range of guitars. Over the last 18 months, I've played my Parker Fly almost exclusively. When I broke out my EBMM to prep for an event where I had concerns about the Parker being ill-received, I had no issues adjusting to the different nut, fretboard, and neck.
While I have had issues in the past, at this point, playing an unfamiliar guitar is like driving an unfamiliar car. I might have to search for the switch is to turn on the headlights and the seat might not adjust the way I'd like but I can drive safely to my destination. At the end of the day, I get back to my familiar car and I'm more comfortable.
I'm late to the party it looks like, but I'll throw in my two cents as someone who, for a long time, has owned only one moderately-priced guitar at a time.
I would say it depends on how wide a range of music you play, how much modification you want to do, and how quickly you move between genres/sounds that you want to get out of your guitar. If you like and actively play a bunch of different genres and styles, multiple guitars will be more conducive. And by a bunch, I mean like if you're playing country, classic rock, funk, blues, and metal all on a regular basis, you'll be better off with a few guitars each suited to one or two of those genres, rather than one super guitar that has been modded to a massive extent to get all of those sounds, since you'll drive yourself crazy trying to find the right combination of mods to suit each of those.
If you're into modifying a guitar and you don't play a ton of different styles, or you move between them slowly enough that modification won't get super expensive all at once, one well-built guitar is fine. That's kind of the road I went...I have a PRS SE Custom. I love that thing, it's got great sustain for how light it is, and when I needed some different tones, I did some modifications. It's not what I would consider a high-end guitar, since it's only about a $600 guitar or so. A good low-end-of-the-high-end guitar will give you a solid, well-built foundation for you to build your tones off of without breaking the bank or making you reluctant to open it up.
For me, the ultimate example would be the Les Paul Studio (I'm gunning for an Epiphone in the near future to do some work on, but the Gibson is the same idea). It's a no-frills, no-extra-gimmicks, but still-well-crafted guitar that gives you a platform to start from. Between that and my PRS, I should be able to nail all the tones I need. A buddy of mine has around a dozen guitars, but he really only plays like three of them. I'll never be that guy.
Just my thoughts.
I have owned everything form peavey, Gibson, Ibanez, Jackson, Charvel, esp, and more. Some were as much as 800.00 and some as little as 125.00, pretty average range. I started playing at 13, and Im older than I want to be right now =P What tends to happen with affordable guitars, is they start breaking down, tremolos rust, tuning gets wacky, lacks sustain and depth, volume knobs scratch, pickups need replacing on most. You always wonder in the back of your head, will that nice guitar change everything.?
My advice is, buy that one guitar, it will make the biggest difference in your playing. Don't be a guitar whore, =P
'Guitar whores' are good for the economy, and those funds in turn go into more guitar developments and options.