Gearjoneser
Gear Ho
Re: Fender Blues Jr 80 proof
The 65 - 67 blackfaces are the ones that fetch the most money. Everything is perfect about them, although new speakers are always an improvement over the worn out originals.
I say 65 - 74 because that's when it had no master volume. Master volume Fender silverfaces sounded more sterile and lifeless. However, it's always recommended to do the silverface to blackface circuitry mods, which is simpler on pre - 75 models, as far as I know.
I'm not sure what kind of wood was used on every year of silverface, but I do believe the cabinets were slightly larger, which isn't a bad thing. I think they're a little taller and deeper.
I like that it's in between the size and wattage of a Deluxe and a Twin.
hey Joe (and all others, actually?) is there a substantial delta in quality within that age group of Pro Reverbs given the switchover from blackface to silverface in that era?
are you recommending the blackface ones in the 65-67 era or the FMIC silverfaces after '67? or are either a good bet? ... i am seeing guys advertising amps as '65' but the pic shows the blackface panel with FMIC (CBS) on it, not FEIC (pre CBS)
what do you think ?
thanks
bc
The 65 - 67 blackfaces are the ones that fetch the most money. Everything is perfect about them, although new speakers are always an improvement over the worn out originals.
I say 65 - 74 because that's when it had no master volume. Master volume Fender silverfaces sounded more sterile and lifeless. However, it's always recommended to do the silverface to blackface circuitry mods, which is simpler on pre - 75 models, as far as I know.
I'm not sure what kind of wood was used on every year of silverface, but I do believe the cabinets were slightly larger, which isn't a bad thing. I think they're a little taller and deeper.
I like that it's in between the size and wattage of a Deluxe and a Twin.
Last edited: