Fender's claim to their "Bullet" strings???

thespricket

New member
I was on fender's website looking about their sudgestions on set-ups. Under stringing, it says that you should always use Fender Bullet strings, because they are designed to withstand tremello use and stay in tune.

this sounds like a marketing thing at first, but i understand how they may not just be trying to sell strings.

This is a huge fender forum, Ive noticed a bunch of you guys play fenders. So i was just wondering if any of you have tried them with any succes.

I use ernie ball slinkys now, but i'm willing to try these out.
 
Re: Fender's claim to their "Bullet" strings???

My Squier came with neckel-plated Bullets. The felt okay, I switched to stainless steel bullets and WOW!!!!!!! I loved the sound, the feel and they stayed in tune quite well. Unfortunately, I tried D'Adario and preferred the feel and I don't use my tremelo much, it's almost always off, so i don't want to have to pay more for Fender strings. I wish I could actually find a guitar shop that sold D'Adario stainless steels, I've seen them on the website, and I want them in my axe!!!! Personally, I don't believe they're worth the extra money, but if you use your tremelo a lot, they may be worth a shot. At least you can always find the stainless steel ones.

P.S. I'm also a Slinky fan, and as for playing Blue Steel strings which you can always find, I hate Dean Markely strings.
 
Re: Fender's claim to their "Bullet" strings???

I personally like fender Stainless Steel strings, i dont have any guitas with a trem so i just use normal strings. But Fenders strings last longer than the slinkies and the blue steel are way too... they just dont work for me.
 
Re: Fender's claim to their "Bullet" strings???

i use ghs, but the bullets are really good too. if that claim is true, then ghs should be recognized for it too.
 
Re: Fender's claim to their "Bullet" strings???

IMO the fender Bullet strings are just a marketing ploy. If they do in fact increase sustain and tuning stability? I never noticed. I use D'Addario strings exclusively on all my guitars,Just like SD PuPs. When I find a good product, I stick with it.

BTW, I found a excellent online vendor for strings.www.stringsandbeyond.com
I got a 10 pack of D'Addario's XL's for $29.99 . Any order over $35 and you get free shipping. So I ordered (5) .010 plain E stings at $1.15 each to put me over $35.
 
Re: Fender's claim to their "Bullet" strings???

I tried them a few times and found that the bullet ends would always pop off! That's how they broke, not at the saddle like a "normal" string. I wasn't impressed with them.
 
Re: Fender's claim to their "Bullet" strings???

my local shop does not even carry Fender Strings anymore... I use any brand... i'm not picky... sometimes i buy cheaper store brand strings in bulk.... I've never really found huge differences between brands, only alloys...

The Bullet strings i liked for only one reason and that is the Bullet is made to fit in the trem block nice and sweet... but like Fenderfan said above they do break sometimes right at the Bullet
 
Re: Fender's claim to their "Bullet" strings???

Well, on first five albums YJM used ernie ball than he switched to fender bullets and I think his tone was way better with with EBies. And he wanks quite a bit, check out Live in Leningrad those are still Ebies I believe and they seem to stay in tune.
 
Re: Fender's claim to their "Bullet" strings???

D'addarios are great, haven't found a set a like better yet. Tried those bullets. They're nothing great, not bad though.
 
Re: Fender's claim to their "Bullet" strings???

I've been using the Bullets for over 10 years on my G&L guitars with the Dual Fulcrum Vibrato. This Vibrato is a Leo Fender design, and while it is an improvement over the vintage Fender "Synchonized Tremelo", it uses a similar block under the bridge plate.

Fender Bullet strings come in their Pure Nickel, Stainless and Super Bullet alloy. The advantage of the Bullet end is two-fold: first there is no double-wrap needed to secure Bullet as on a ball-end string; and the smooth nose of the Bullet fits better in the string tunnel of the Vibrato Block.

With a ball-end string, frequently the doubled end-wrap will make contact against the apex of the string saddle and cause false harmonics, buzzing, and tuning instability. No double wrap--no problem.

A ball-end will twist and move in the sting tunnel, and sometimes get hung up temporarily on a rough area, again causing tuning instability. The smooth nose of the Bullet string simply fits better, and has very little chance of getting bound up in the Vibrato Block.

Bullet strings are designed for guitars with Fender-style Vibratos, and are not recommended for guitars with string ferrules in the back of the guitar (Telecasters); guitars with Stop Tailpieces (Les Pauls, etc.); guitars with a plastic ferrule block (ASATs); or on guitars with trapeze-style tailpiece (ES-175, L-5, etc.). Obviously, they won't work on guitars with Bigsby Vibratos--the Bigsby requires a string with a ball-end. Fender does market strings in the same gauges and alloys as Bullets, but with the traditional ball-end.

You may or may not notice better tuning stability with the Fender Bullet strings, but in my experience I would give them the nod in this regard. I have found them to be long lasting and very durable. Fender Super Bullets will continue to be my string of choice for my G&L Legacys, S-500s, and Comanches.

Bill
 
Re: Fender's claim to their "Bullet" strings???

I personally dont like fender strings. I use DRs all the way
 
Re: Fender's claim to their "Bullet" strings???

I believe Fender's claim that the bullets might work better in Fender trems than other brands. But I much prefer the way GHS Boomers sound, and thats whats more important. The Fender strings dont seem to last as long either.
 
Re: Fender's claim to their "Bullet" strings???

can't tell a difference
 
Re: Fender's claim to their "Bullet" strings???

The ones I tried were ok, but the only real advantage I noticed was that they were easier to take out when changing strings. They may sit a little better, but with a proper setup I can't tell a difference. I wouldn't not string up a guitar with them, but they don't seem to be worth it. I usually stick to GHS or DR. I've had the most luck with them.
 
Re: Fender's claim to their "Bullet" strings???

I haven't used them in over 20 years because when I did, the bullets popped off like crazy. I had them in my strat and while the sound was okay, I couldn't deal with the short string life and the popping bullets, lol.
 
Re: Fender's claim to their "Bullet" strings???

Remember too, Fender states that their guitars sound their best through their amps. Yes, of course, it's a marketing strategy. I use a Strat with Ernie Balls through a Marshall and have had no problems or complaints with this combination since 1969. FWIW, I have no use for Fender Bullets or Super Bullets.
 
Re: Fender's claim to their "Bullet" strings???

i use fender bullets. i like the tone and they never seem to break. it also helps that the bullet end fits in the tremelo string cavity of my ibanez. no more cutting off ends + clamping at the bridge.

why would fender bullets not be able to be used on guitars with string-through bodies (ferruls??), ect? makes no sense. i use 10-46 bullets on all my guitars because they fit in the ibanez bridge without having to clamp
 
Last edited:
Re: Fender's claim to their "Bullet" strings???

The advantage of the Bullet end is two-fold: first there is no double-wrap needed to secure Bullet as on a ball-end string; and the smooth nose of the Bullet fits better in the string tunnel of the Vibrato Block.

Sorry but what is a double wrap? Its probably something obvious iv just never heard that before.

THanks
 
Re: Fender's claim to their "Bullet" strings???

why would fender bullets not be able to be used on guitars with string-through bodies (ferruls??), ect? makes no sense. i use 10-46 bullets on all my guitars because they fit in the ibanez bridge without having to clamp

I know they don't recommend them on certain bridges--my understanding is that on some guitars the bullet can get caught and be hard to remove.

Bill
 
Back
Top