Nope. The one great feature of MM guitars, the lovely gunstock oil and wax neck finish, they don't offer on this model. I suppose if it had that neck finish, I could be tempted to try the all black one.
You should keep the Tikibird and let this obsession pass, IMO. The MM is a really ugly guitar (like all their guitars are). If you must get one, don't lose the Tikibird to do it (sell something else), and definitely get the black, both for looks and for price.
It's not gunstock oil. It specifically is the product TruOil. It needs to be refreshed every now and then, along with the wax, so it's easy enough to convert other guitars.
Overall I just wish that MM was a less stubborn company.
all of their guitars (that I've seen) have 4+2 or 5+2 tuner arrangements means I'll probably never buy one. I think putting the tuners like that is hideous and counterintuitive.
I dig em, and they help the guitar balance better, and I am all about that. My 2 favorite guitars are MMs. But hey, I also love Steinbergers, so I am kinda into the ergonomic thing.
I'd sooner play a Steinberger than one with the MM headstock, since with Steinbergers you tune everything at the same place. It just seems bizarre to tune one of the treble strings on the same side as the bass strings and the other two treble strings on the other side. I don't care much about balance though, as long as the guitar doesn't neck-dive. But obviously I don't begrudge anyone who's into it. I'll stick with my 3+3, 6 in line, and 3+4
With P-90's
![]()
![]()