Full Review of Line 6/Bogner Spider Valve

Re: Full Review of Line 6/Bogner Spider Valve

All right... just gave the 2x12 model a thorough test drive with an MIA Strat and my HH Silhouette.

My experience was largely the same as Joe's... although I should note that I found the midgain tones and clean tones to be more satisfying with the Strat. Still didn't really match the sounds a good tube amp can produce but this gets closer than anything else I've tried. Backing off the volume of the guitar on high-gain sounds doesn't really cause the amp to clean up that well at lower ranges... just kinda makes the tone a little crumbly.

The only other really weak point I found was that even at the higher gain/volume settings sometimes the sustain and the drive of the tones was somewhat lacking, as in you didn't get that long, rich, blooming sustain you're used to with a good tube amp. Makes me wonder if different tubes or a boost pedal would change that, though.

This sounds better than any POD/Power amp combo I've ever heard, and it's certainly the best feeling, best sounding Line 6 I've ever tried. I found the amps heavier tones to sound best with the master presence rolled back to about 4, as the amp can be overly bright and a tad brittle with the presence up too high. GJ's right about the volume jumps in between amp changes... it's like when you change amps the channel volume is automatically set on 7 or 8, but you really only need it to be on 5 or 6. Speaking of which, this amp is probably downright scary as a 100W head/half stack, because the 40 watt version was loud as sh!t. Loud and authoritative, but not EXCESSIVELY loud... it had plenty of good "real world" useable power. I've long thought of 100W tube amps as overkill in most people's playing situations... most guitarists don't need that kind of power unless we're playing arenas, stadiums, or other large venues. It's like taking an F1 racer to work every day during rush hour. The 40W this amp offers is great to work with.

Of note... the sticker on the front of the amp said this amp was using 5881 power tubes. I was confused because I thought these came with 6L6's, but I looked in the back and lo and behold a duet of 5881s was staring me in the face. Wonder if they changed something at the factory?

I think Line 6 did something really cool with this amp, and it's a big step in a really neat direction for guitar amps. It'll be interesting to see what happens when the technology gets refined and updated.
 
Re: Full Review of Line 6/Bogner Spider Valve

5881's are basically the same as 6L6's, or at least very closely related. They're interchangeable.

I know what you mean about the sustain and bloom that a tube preamp gives, that the Spider Valve lacks, but I think it's made up for the more you crank it.

It's got a few negatives, but really, the positives far outweight them. The fact that you can store hundreds of presets is pretty cool. The reverb is a bit dramatic, so I found myself keeping it very low, but I do the same on the new Marshall JVM.

I think I'll find the 100W head on a great cabinet a lot more exciting. The open backs are OK, but for all those rock/metal tones, I think the amp will sound crushing on a 4-12.

For me, I've decided to just continue using my tube amps in real situations, and my Valvetronix AD60VTH head at home. The volume is very tameable on the Vox, but the Line 6 Spider Valve head would be overkill for my purposes.
 
Last edited:
Re: Full Review of Line 6/Bogner Spider Valve

I finally got to try one of these things. 1x12 combo. I only messed with the crunch (marshall) channel(s) as they are what I'd be on 99.9% of time.

Long story short: My opinion (having owned one) is to go buy a XT live and an Atomic Reactor. FAR BETTER than this Spider Valve thing. The Atomic/POD combo is more dynamic, punchy, touch responsive and "tubey".The spider valve has nearly the same "disconnect" under the fingers that typical Line 6 has unless you CRANK the thing, and then its way too **** loud for anything but a gig. At home, forget it, the Atomic is much better (and still lacking sorely, IME).

The Marshall channel flat out sucks IMO on the Spidervalve. I dialed and dialed and dialed. The mid gain sounds are really buzzy/brittle/harsh and at the same time nasal and congested. It smoothed out a bit with the gain upwards of 3 oclock.

I didn't even bother with the rest of the amp channels or effects.

I plugged into a Vox AD30VT next to it (my absolute least fave VOX VT) and got FAR better marshall tones on it's Plexi and 800 channels. Warmer , more dynamic and much better tube amp "feel".

I'd get a Flextone over the SV, I think.
 
Re: Full Review of Line 6/Bogner Spider Valve

What I find is that almost all modelers have harsh crunchy Marshall tones, and that for authentic Marshall tones, it's best to crank the gain on their Tweed settings. The Spider Valve is kinda like that.

Jeff, I cringed too when I first heard those British settings. It's one amp that you really have to tweak for a long time before you start finding good tones. It's the polar opposite of a 'plug in and play' amp. Those volume jumps are a big negative. It'd take some time to preset everything and harness the goods.
 
Re: Full Review of Line 6/Bogner Spider Valve

Jeff, I cringed too when I first heard those British settings. It's one amp that you really have to tweak for a long time before you start finding good tones. It's the polar opposite of a 'plug in and play' amp. Those volume jumps are a big negative. It'd take some time to preset everything and harness the goods.

Having owned the POD XTL, I went in knowing I'd have to dial Joe, but I found the SV worse the XTL/Atomic combo for required tweaking. I didn't even bother with the pre-sets instead going into crunch channel "manual" mode and started from there.

I really think the Atomic and a XTL is a far better mousetrap for around the same $, and will be far more versatile.

No modeller sounds like the real thing, but the VT are the best thing so far AFAIC.
 
Back
Top