GHS Boomers - Yay or Nay?

Re: GHS Boomers - Yay or Nay?

I started using them back around 1980. I always liked them more than anything else i'd used, they seemed to hold their brightness for longer, and they sounded and felt good to me.

Here in Melbourne, and possibly all of Australia, they became almost impossible to find by the mid '90s, and I was forced to use whatever else was around, and that was mainly D'Adario, which used to make me really angry. Several times in music shops i went into some classic Crusty rants to the guys behind the counters ... "Of course the kids today are all buying D'Adarios .... you're not giving them any choices !"

However things have improved over the last few years and more stores are carrying them now. Plus there is the option of buying them in bulk via the internet.

I've also been using GHS acoustic strings for the last few years.

But yeah, i like Boomers, they work for me and don't cause me any problems, and all my guitars seem to sound good, so as long as they remain available, I'll be using them.
 
Re: GHS Boomers - Yay or Nay?

I started with GHS Boomers. They always sounded too dull after very little use and felt cheap to me. D'Addarios have been ok in comparison. I've owned fancy stuff like Snake Oil Strings and while they sounded better, were not worth the money. I finally found Dean Markley's signature series strings and I've stuck with them ever since. Great tone, long lasting and fairly priced.

Sorry guys, I have to say GHS Boomers were one of the worst strings I've tried. FWIW, I don't remember being too keen on Ernie Ball strings either.
 
Re: GHS Boomers - Yay or Nay?

I use the Gilmour set on my ultra strat. Perfect match. I've run EBs, D'Addarios, Elixirs and a whole bunch of others, and they got all rusty in a couple weeks.
 
GHS Boomers - Yay or Nay?

What are you people doing, putting god damn battery acid on your corn flakes? I've never rusted a string in my life...

Anyway, Bloodrose....

The guages, for one thing. There's two different sets of Gilmour strings, the red and blue. Reds are intended for Les Pauls and other short scales and go from 10.5 to 50, while the blues are intended for Strats and go from 10 to 48. I have the blues on my Pacifica and had the reds on my Westone. They're great strings. Very warm and mellow sounding. I really liked how they were heavy strings but they don't really feel heavy. They bend way easier than the D'addario 10s I replaced with them.

The Mustaine set goes from 10 to 52. I don't even like Dave Mustaine; I got them because I wanted a light top/heavy bottom set for my 24" scale Supersonic and they were the only set my shop had that weren't Ernie Balls (I ****ing hate Slinkies). They differ from the Gilmour sets in pretty much the way you would expect; brighter, punchier, heavier and more aggressive. They're really good feeling strings, though. Plus they last for ages. I put them on my Supersonic about five weeks ago and they still sound pretty good. And I play that guitar hard. They sound thicker than the D'addarios but they retain a lot of that brightness and snap. Really good strings. Plus I pretty much stopped having to tune that guitar, which is cool.

I have an odd substance living inside my left hand or something. If they aren't coated they're only worth one or two days then I have clean and polish the fretboard. Cleartone EMP 10s are the best strings I've used in sound and longevity.
 
Re: GHS Boomers - Yay or Nay?

Man, you guys are crazy ha I love d'addario! I feel like all other brands are stiff and lifeless. I guess when I'm touring I restring everyday so it doesn't really matter, but I still prefer them.
 
Re: GHS Boomers - Yay or Nay?

I love the ghs boomers, they are the only strings I use. I used to use dean markley, then DR dimebag, finally settled on boomers. The main reason I use them is because they have a crazy lifespan and are pretty much unbreakable. They also offer my absolute favorite size 10-52.
 
Re: GHS Boomers - Yay or Nay?

They are fine, not any better or worse than Ernie Balls or D'Addarios really, but cheaper, at least at thomann.de where I usually buy them. :)
 
Re: GHS Boomers - Yay or Nay?

I haven't used Boomers since the early '80s. Seem too slick to me. Like playing on cables. I remember reading an interview with Angus Young back in the day and they asked what kind of strings he usd and he said he didn't know, you'd have to ask his guitar guy. He said probably whatever is cheapest. Anyway, alot is your imagination. If someone put different strings on your guitars as a test you couldn't name the brands. There's only a few string manufacturing companies and they're just packaged differently. If you guys have rusty strings, you must live in some awful salty climates because I've never had strings rust in the 35 years I've been playing.
 
Re: GHS Boomers - Yay or Nay?

I usually play DR TIte Fits, but on my seven strings and anything that gets tuned down any significant amount I actually prefer Boomers for the added brightness.

TBH I only started buying boomers again because mix + matching a 10-60 7 string set and an 11-80 Zakk Wylde set was the fastest way to get my 7 string sets together in the guages I wanted. Just luckily turned out that the results were good, too.

Rocksoldier, have you taken a look @ www.saitenkatalog.de ? ;)

... Anyway, alot is your imagination. If someone put different strings on your guitars as a test you couldn't name the brands. There's only a few string manufacturing companies and they're just packaged differently...

I couldn´t name the brands, but I could tell you exactly what I liked and disklike about each string from both a tactile and aural perspective. And while I agree that there is a lot of snake oil, i think you´re underrstimating the possible differences a bit.

While it´s true there are only a handful of string manufacturing plants IN THE USA (and about another 50 in the ROW IIRC), there are still many, many different ways to choose, mix and match core and wind wraps, I can think of 10 basic ones off the top of my head And I know there are dozens more.. Add on to that things like cryogenic treatment, "compression winding", "tension winding" ( the latter a concept who´s difference to normal string winding remains unfathomable to me, but some swear by it), yaddayaddablabla.... so just by taking those base 10 and applying those 3 we get 40 distinct variants, none with 2 "special" characteristics. if we add on the possibility of combining features, there are suddenly 80 different permutations.

So, if we assume rougly 25 viably unique ways to build a string (a number I know is realistic but still a bit low), and say 5 "special features" for the entire market (also a but lowballed), just repackaged and relabeled to fit reseller Bs marketing vs reseller B´s, we still have a whopping 800 different possible combinations, each with their owh inherent toinal and tensile qualities.

Then there´s the topic of exact alloy composition. Every metal alloy (which essentially all metals are for this purpose, as 100% purity is near impossible.) has an individual tension coefficient, breaking strength, and mass /volume. All of these together with it´s inherent magnetic (or non magnetic ) properties play a defining role in the tone of the individual string, you can heavily alter the tone of a string merely by adding 1% impurities /alloyands to the current slag. As most string companies used to (any some probably still do) draw their own wrap and core wire, there´s already a huge potential for variation right there even without intentional tampering.... and things get really interesting when Dr Winderstein starts wanting a stronger variation of the flux field ("more output") and adding cobalt, or wanting a different tension and mixing in plate of V2A or CrMo steel to the core.... As a result, Nickel plated steel does not necessarily = Nickel plated steel, Pure nickel does not necessarily = Pure nickel, and stainless steel does not necessarily= stainless steel.

But whether "homedrawn" or outsourced, there is enough capital involved and a large enough demand of raw materials that they can get or produce the exact mix thex want for each individual model of string they produce.

And all of this is only just barely scratching the surface. I wrote a 20 page dissentary on the future of string composition during my apprenticeship, and that was 15 years ago.... The overally verdict was that if you truly want absolute perfection every time, you have to either learn abour smelting and draw them yourself or wait another 20 or 30 years until you can say "I want a string that´s..." and it strings itself up automatically (as would my at the time theoretically proposed but currently still technologically unfeasible "laser strings).

However, seeing as technology moves forward many while guitarists steadfastly cling to the past, there should be (and are) more truly different models of string than ever before. As far as choice of strings go, we truly do live in a Golden Age at present, it has never been easier to find the perfect string your each individual player and ear.... but for many it´s still a pipe dream, even my beloved DRs are only there until someone finally makes the perfect string for me ;)
 
Last edited:
Re: GHS Boomers - Yay or Nay?

Never was a big fan. The only pack I ever bought only lasted a few days vs Ernie Balls which last 2 weeks to a month for me.
 
Re: GHS Boomers - Yay or Nay?

Here is the unique thing about boomers, in my opinion. When you first put them on they are very bright and stiff sounding. It is like a momentary crunch handicap, it takes them a few days to break in tonally. Then they last forever and sound better and better each day. Kind of like getting your hair cut too short so that you can look good next week instead of today? Ok, this is probably the wrong audience for haircut analogy. :headbang:

If you are a hardcore touring musician who changes strings every day then these might not be for you. If you are lazy and cheap and hate paying for/changing strings, the boomers are perfect.
 
Re: GHS Boomers - Yay or Nay?

I like them quite a bit, but not on every guitar, and not all the time.
 
Re: GHS Boomers - Yay or Nay?

I find them to be "average". It's a good string, but not what I like. Ernie Balls are good but do not last very long. D'Addarios are great.
 
Re: GHS Boomers - Yay or Nay?

I switched from D'Addario to GHS Boomers about two years ago and I'm not going back. It's hard to describe, but the GHS strings seem fresher and snappier. The 10-52 set works very well for my style, but I use 10-46 on my Duo Jet and my Tele to make sure they intonate properly (the Duo Jet has a bar bridge and the Tele has a compensated three barrel).

I recently tried GHS's coated strings on the Tele and so far I like them. The somewhat odd feel is more than made up for by their longevity.
 
Re: GHS Boomers - Yay or Nay?

I've been a D'Addario user for the most part of my forty-four years as a player.

I've tried'em all, but no other brand has been so much better to make me wanna switch. It's been the only constant among a wholelotta other variables.

XLs for electrics, EXPs for Acoustics, Pro Arte for Classical.

They're for me like the old friend you can always trust, no matter what.

HTH,
 
Back
Top