Gibson ES Model?

marcg71

New member
Anyone know if the ES-175, 135 & 137 are about the same size? I don't see these models that often at local stores.

What other major differences are there?
 
Re: Gibson ES Model?

the 175 has a full depth body, the 135 and 137 have a thinner body. i think the 175 has a smaller width.
 
Re: Gibson ES Model?

Many Thanks bryvincent! Anyone use one of these for blues/rock? Do they tend to be as heavy as LPs? I' m lookin to pickup a hollowbody and the 137 caught my eye. Just don't know much about em.
 
Re: Gibson ES Model?

If you're used to a Les Paul, the 175 will be lighter, but feel huge until you've played it for awhile. The left hand feeling isn't that different, but your picking forearm will be kicked out further.

None of them will be as heavy as a Les Paul.
 
Re: Gibson ES Model?

Keep in mind that the big jazz boxes won't have anywhere near as good access to the high frets...335 or similar is better for that.
 
Re: Gibson ES Model?

Also, the 175 is fully hollow where as the 135 and 137 have center blocks.

Keep in mind that the big jazz boxes won't have anywhere near as good access to the high frets...335 or similar is better for that.

+1 on both counts.... a 175 is gonna be a huge departure from something like a Les Paul or SG. Unlike the ones with center blocks, it'll feedback like crazy, and tone and feel-wise, it's not even the same ballpark.

Of course, none of those are reasons you shouldn't try one :) I have a really old one (50's?) with a single P-90 in the neck, and there's nothing like it.
 
Re: Gibson ES Model?

Hey thanks for the info. I was originally lookin at 335s and came across the 137.

A 335 is much closer in feel and fit to a solid body, and makes an easy transition. The neck joins at the 19th fret, so you have more access than an LP, Strat, or Tele. It has a center block like a 135 and 137 that adds sustain and eliminates most feedbeck issues. I'm not sure of the neck joint with those, but it may be at the 14th fret.

Are you leaning towards a semi-hollow or hollow? Or one of each (my recommendation)?
 
Re: Gibson ES Model?

I'm more interested in semi-hollow bodies. I was originally looking into the es 335. Another factor is the es 137 appeared to be cheaper. But I think I'll have to try them both out. Thanks for all the great help!
 
Re: Gibson ES Model?

I'm more interested in semi-hollow bodies. I was originally looking into the es 335. Another factor is the es 137 appeared to be cheaper. But I think I'll have to try them both out. Thanks for all the great help!

The 137 is indeed cheaper.

A friend had a version w/soapbar style pups, I think they were the hum canceling P100s. The models sold today have full size HB pups.

The price of a Gibson 335 has been a bit much for my budget. I've seen some very attractive prices on used 137s. I think the 137 would be fantastic for blues rock.
 
Re: Gibson ES Model?

My advise for you would be to stay away from a full hollow guitar if you are going to play with any volume or gain. Hollow guitars (175, L5, etc.) are prone to "howl" once the volume gets up. The air in them will cause all kinds of microphonic issues at mid to high volume. If you are used to a Les Paul you might want to take a closer look at the new 339. This is a smaller version of a 335. It has a laminated back and sides (which will help reduce feedback) and is just a little bit larger than the Les Paul. Its a great guitar for the money (about $1700 new). It compares in some ways to a Les Paul and a 335. I am planning on picking up a 359 myself. This is basically the same guitar but it has Gibson "Custom" appointments. It has a Custom headstock, ebony board and block inlays, as well as gold hardware. where the 339 has a Rosewood board, dot markers and the plain headstock and nickel appointments. Both a very nice guitars, but the 339 is about $1000. less.
 
Re: Gibson ES Model?

You might also want to look at a couple of other guitars in the Gibson line.

First would be the Custom Shop CS-336/CS-356. The back is carved and hollowed out from a solid block of mahogany, and a carved maple top is laid over that. The 356 version has appointments similar to those of a Les Paul Custom. The body is smaller than a 335, and the sound is closer to that of a Les Paul. Uses Classic '57 pickups, which are some of Gibson's best.

One of Gibson's newer Custom Shop offerings is the ES-339/ES-359 Series. These are constructed similarly to the 335 model, but they have a much smaller body. They are several hundred dollars less than the 336/356 and 335 models. I think these are offered only through five dealers (try Musician's Friend or Guitar Center).

A cautionary note for the ES-137. They are heavy guitars--I think all of my Gibson LPs are lighter than any ES-137 I've played. They come in three trim levels. The Custom features '57 Classic Pickups, and has the Vari-Tone, which I'm not fond of. The Classic version has a little more upscale trim from the base model, but features those awful 490R/498T pickups. Budget accordingly.

I too, considered a ES-137 Classic, but chose a used ES-335. The ES-137 Classic is an attractive guitar, and one of the best values in the Gibson line, IMO. But when I factored in a pickup swap and the weight--the ES-335 came out a clear winner, and definitely worth the extra dough.

Bill
 
Back
Top