Re: Gibson Les Paul Studio Line
It explicitly describes the differences on the page you linked - Burstbucker, coil tapping, Grovers.
And also, the faux binding. Had to look at the picture for that one.
Those were just examples given for each end of the price range in the line. As you know, there are several different models in each range. Some of the lower end also sport the burstbuckers so I doubt that can really be considered in the difference. Grovers are decent tuners for sure, but are they really that much better than the Klusons? On a guitar like that, I think id much prefer the look of the klusons anyway. Coil splitting is a nice feature if you use it, but push/pull pots are about a $10 part retail cost, versus about 6 bucks for a standard pot, so I dont see much added expense besides the extra labor involved in the wiring.
http://www.musiciansfriend.com/guitars/gibson-les-paul-studio-faded-electric-guitar
$799
Handcrafted in Nashville, TN USA
Model name: Gibson Les Paul Studio Faded
Body style: Single-cutaway carved top Les Paul
Top wood: Maple
Body wood: Chambered mahogany
Finish: Nitrocellulose lacquer
Neck: Mahogany
Neck profile: '50s rounded
Nut: Corian
Fingerboard: Obeche
22 jumbo frets
Fingerboard inlays: Figured acrylic trapezoids
Hardware plating: Chrome
Tuners: Kluson 14:1 pearloid key tuners
Neck pickup: Burstbucker Pro
Bridge pickup: Burstbucker Pro
Pickup selector: 3-way
Controls: Volume, Volume, Tone, Tone
Knobs: Black speed
Pickguard: Black
Bridge: Tune-O-Matic
Tailpiece: Stopbar
Gibson gig bag