Has anyone tried a C5, a Breed bridge, an AT-1 and a Brobucker in a Les Paul?

jpage

New member
How did they compare? I like the C5 a lot, but wouldn't mind a little more punch. Playing a pretty bright R8 through modded Marshalls--medium gain.
 
Re: Has anyone tried a C5, a Breed bridge, an AT-1 and a Brobucker in a Les Paul?

Four humbuckers in a Les Paul?

Candidate #1 Nigel Tuffnel
Candidate #2 Steve Howe
 
Re: Has anyone tried a C5, a Breed bridge, an AT-1 and a Brobucker in a Les Paul?

That would definitely give it more punch
 
Re: Has anyone tried a C5, a Breed bridge, an AT-1 and a Brobucker in a Les Paul?

More punch than a Custom 5? How about changing the magnet?

Personally, I would get the Brobucker and crank up the amp Gain a little higher.
 
Re: Has anyone tried a C5, a Breed bridge, an AT-1 and a Brobucker in a Les Paul?

Brobucker on the way...should have more mids, correct?

I'm pretty much going through my yearly, "I want to try a dozen pickups to see if I'm missing anything" phase. I've heard good things about these others, just trolling for opinions. It'll be good for you guys--almost new pickups soon to hit the Trading Post.
 
Re: Has anyone tried a C5, a Breed bridge, an AT-1 and a Brobucker in a Les Paul?

in a Les Paul?

Candidate #1 Nigel Tuffnel
Candidate #2 Steve Howe

Not necessarily a Les Paul
Paul
478060812_b5529d65d4_z.jpg
 
Re: Has anyone tried a C5, a Breed bridge, an AT-1 and a Brobucker in a Les Paul?

I've played all of those pickups, the C5 and the Bro in Les Pauls, the Dimarzios in Superstrats.

The DMZs are nothing like the C5 in any way, shape or form, I don't think they are what you are looking for. If you want more punch than a C5 the Bro will definitely do the trick, it has less output, but more mids and slightly spongier bass, which comes out as punch and you can definitely feel it when you play.

I think that a Brobucker will make your R8 come alive, I have one in my Les Paul and it's staying there forever! (probably:cool2:)
 
Re: Has anyone tried a C5, a Breed bridge, an AT-1 and a Brobucker in a Les Paul?

Try a Breed NECK model in the bridge of your Les Paul. They're amazing in the Bridge position.
 
Re: Has anyone tried a C5, a Breed bridge, an AT-1 and a Brobucker in a Les Paul?

Bump for an old thread but hey I'm doing a search!

I tried a Breed Neck in the bridge and I found it too shrill. It's a neck pickup for a reason.

The AT-1 on the other hand is a pickup I'm very bullish on right now, it's a slightly hotter than PAF pup that comes across a whole lot hotter than it is in terms of balls and authority, but it also has very nice harmonics and a complex tone. It would probably be exactly what the OP was looking for.

I love the Breed Bridge in super strats because it makes them sound a little like my LPs, but a Breed Bridge in an LP would be like (LP)^2, be interesting to try but it might cause a collapse in space-time.
 
Re: Has anyone tried a C5, a Breed bridge, an AT-1 and a Brobucker in a Les Paul?

The AT-1 does not sound PAFish at all...great pickup though
 
Re: Has anyone tried a C5, a Breed bridge, an AT-1 and a Brobucker in a Les Paul?

I was talking about output. According to DiMarzio, 36th = ~280mv, AT-=~320mv, hardly an audible difference, but to my ear, the 36th sounds very traditional, BRIGHT PAF; the AT-1 sounds like a JB thas has been working out at the gym 8 hours a day for 6 mos.

As to where it fits in the scale, I'd put it a step up from a hot PAF, between there and a Breed. For a DiMarzio, its not un-Duncan sounding, but I find it has more authority in the lows.
 
Re: Has anyone tried a C5, a Breed bridge, an AT-1 and a Brobucker in a Les Paul?

I tried a Breed Neck in the bridge and I found it too shrill. It's a neck pickup for a reason.
See this is a perfect example of how everyone's mileage will differ.
I had great results with the breed neck in the bridge, so as we can see when we recommend a pup to someone it is a real crap shoot for them.
 
Re: Has anyone tried a C5, a Breed bridge, an AT-1 and a Brobucker in a Les Paul?

Yeah it depends on what you want.

Some people love standard wind PAFs in the bridge; I can't stand them and want something less shrill. I found the Breed neck even more shrill than say a '59b; it has this high end presence thing happening that made me squint.

On the other hand, in the neck I want something as bright and tight and single-coil ish as I can get.
 
Re: Has anyone tried a C5, a Breed bridge, an AT-1 and a Brobucker in a Les Paul?

Yeah it depends on what you want.

Some people love standard wind PAFs in the bridge; I can't stand them and want something less shrill. I found the Breed neck even more shrill than say a '59b; it has this high end presence thing happening that made me squint.

On the other hand, in the neck I want something as bright and tight and single-coil ish as I can get.

Me too. I've fought the 'tinny bridge/muffled neck syndrome' for years. What I do is use warm amgnets and/or 250K pots to take away treble and add mids to my bridge PU's. I want a full, rich tone from them. Like you, I like neck PU's to be bright and clear. Moving they're EQ's closer to each other makes it so much easier to get an amp EQ setting that's great for both PU's.
 
Back
Top