Rex_Rocker
Well-known member
How are they? How do they compare to Tung Sol or Sovtek 5881's?

I've been thinking of getting a 50w JVM head and running it with 5881s.
Have run regular Sovetec big bottle 5881 lable tubes as well as the JJ's both are ok. The 5881's i prefer tone wise are the old short bottle Sovetec with the small base that Mesa used to use. Bigger fatter and smoother tones that any of the other current production 5881's I have tried. LOVED them in my Fender Prosonics in particular!!
This version of the Sovetec 5881.
https://www.fullcompass.com/prod/17...MI34P3hLOa3gIVwcDICh14KwKbEAQYASABEgKLQPD_BwE
Awesome! So the JJ's are less bassy than the TS's? That seems like they'd fit my amp well.I have a set in a Marshall JCM900 50W. At lower volumes they all kind of sound the same. At higher volumes I didn't care for the stock Sovteks, I can't quite recall what I didn't like about them though. The JJ is pretty well balanced between bass/mid/treble, the Tung-Sol had more bass and treble than the JJ (still more mods than most 6L6GCs) but they weren't as durable as the JJs for the voltages in my amp.
If no one has yet said this, the Sovtek 5881 is not a true 5881, neither is it a true 6L6GC, it is a military tube that had approximate specs to a 6L6 but less output, so they labeled it a 5881, but it takes more voltage like a 6L6GC. It was brought out when there were no more real 6L6 tubes being made after the last Western factories closed down, and was the only tube at the time other than NOS that would work in a 6L6 amp. Later, more companies from Asia and Eastern Europe started making real 6L6 tubes, and then real 5881 tubes like the Tungsol. I don't know where the JJ 5881 sits, I have no knowledge of that.
Al
I have a set in a Marshall JCM900 50W. At lower volumes they all kind of sound the same. At higher volumes I didn't care for the stock Sovteks, I can't quite recall what I didn't like about them though.