Ya I know I effed on the MOOT thing, I'm at work trying to waste company time on here without getting in trouble, so gotta hurry when I type. Things happened. Jeez English Nazis.
Expanding on this a little more, also keep in mind that record labels push artists to bang out albums. The going rate used to be to put out one album per year, if not one album every 8 months.
Bands are constantly touring, between recording, publicity in terms of events, radio stations, etc, they barely have down time. So when they do go into the studio, do you honestly think their tone is going to be polished? It's like the have a month to mass produce an album. There's a trade off here.
and yes, bands musical taste will change and so will their tone. They have to advance with the times. Look at what Metallica did with their music. Same with Aerosmith. We can argue on whether it's any good or not all we want but the fact of the matter is they adapted with the times.
Most bands will try to switch it up in the end. Take Ac/DC for example. Had some good material. Except all their songs were the same chords and the same tone. Do you really wanna play that over and over and over again?
Speaking personally, after playing my originals with my band for the last year straight, I don't want to play those songs again for a while. My band got tired of the sound, so we're switching it up.
What about Yngwie's new tone?
I haven't heard him much with the new sig pickups. I think his archetype tone was freaking amazing.
Has he adjusted his gain down for the new higher output, or is it getting heavier?
When I think of so many of the greats for most of Rock's history, they used stock stuff for the most part. Very little boutique stuff and the tones were great. Boutique gear doesn't necessarily mean better tone, just more choices.
Also, I'm constantly tweaking my amp settings to come up with something new. I could imagine if I was in a band on a world tour playing the same amp tones every night I'd get bored and uninspired quickly. I don't know how ACDC kept it going all these years
No worries man! Just too many destroyers of the english language out there on the interwebs. You're misspellings have good reasons though!
Both Santana and Blackmore have progressed, in different ways. I don't know what amp Carlos used in Woodstock, but by Abraxass, he was using Mesa Boogie. In Woodstock he played Gibson SG, and in the 70s was playing Les Pauls. I don't particularly care for his PRS tones, but his musical style has definitely changed. The stuff he is playing now doesn't even come close to sounding like the old Carlos (think of Black Magic Woman vs Smooth). He sounds like he has gone back to his latin roots vs Rock & Roll.Santana sounded best at Woodstock. Richie Blackmore sounded best at the California Jam concert, IMO they never progressed