*Some* amount of quack can be achieved by inner coils of humbuckers in parallel, but it will never be much compared to two single coils - either neck & middle, or middle & neck. Strong quack requires the close physical proximity that only a middle position pup can provide. I just went thru a project finding that out for myself, where i even had 2 bonafide singlecoils installed in a HH guitar and even then, the quack was only subtle. I also tried Half Out Of Phase wiring that is reported to add quack, but i found that the tone it added was more of an acoustic-like strum sound, not a quack.
I agree with this. It's like the Telecaster middle position.
Wasn't there a wiring, either by Ibanez or PRS that did outside coils in parallel, inside coils in series?
Sent from my SM-A115A using Tapatalk
It works better with some pickups than others. But to me, it is 'close enough'.
If you don't want to mess with a mag flip, (and reverse wiring), I always love the bridge slug with the neck screw. Works good, sounds great.
how about wiring the neck in parallel, would that get close to the "2" position on a strat (neck+middle)?
Wiring a humbuckers' 2 coils in parallel has a "hollow" type sound to me... i don't hear "quack" in that configuration, personally.
To your original question, you will get some quack when you wire the two inner coils of an HH in parallel. I was just trying to make you aware that - per my experience - the amount of quack will be far less than when a middle position pup is present, like in a Strat's Positions 2 and 4. So split inner coils will yield the most quack that a HH guitar can provide, in my opinion.
A few members report in this thread at The Gear Page forum that keeping the two coils that are being combined in parallel as NON-hum-canceling yields more quack vs. the two being hum-canceling. At least, for singlecoil type pups. I'm assuming that holds true for splitcoils of two humbuckers.
https://www.thegearpage.net/board/in...1597731/page-2
And, magnet flipping isn't the only option to achieve hum-canceling inner coils. Intead, one pup can be rotated 180 degrees and then you wire the coilsplit specifically for the two inner coils.
That's an interesting discussion, but, (IMHO), it lacks some science. With the exception of one thing. Remember, an RWRP single flips the polarity twice. Which brings it back to "normal", so to speak. It's only the signal picked up out of the air that's affected. Their IS however, one bit of science here. On a non-RWRP pup, all three singles are magnetizing the strings with the same polarity. With an RWRP middle, the middle magnet is opposing the N & B. That, in and of itself, could contribute to a slightly stronger overall output . . . thus, more "quack."
I'd like to perform this experiment myself, but right now, I think all my Strats have gone noiseless. I do have a pre-wired DD SC-101 set, but I'd need to find another SC-101 neck to match. I doubt that a non-RWRP SC-101 middle exists.
allright, quack aside, would a neck in parallel come closest to the 2 position on a strat? the split inners does quack but seems to be a bit more like a tele, i'm looking for that polite, almost acoustic-y 2 position sound that i had on a Jackson DK2, it was a 24 fret guitar with duncan STK-1's in the neck and middle, that 2 position sounded glorious!
btw: is the STK1 strat pickup discontinued? shame because i really liked that one!
i think that whole thing doesn't make sense considering all the stratty tones we love are 2 and 4 positions which are noiseless by default, TGP can be a weird place![]()