HSS review

ganzosrevenge

New member
American Special Stratocaster HSS (Seymourized) Review
By Jason S. Ganz

It seems that this stratocaster is growing a little following on the SDUGF, so I'm going to write a subjective review of mine to give everyone a good idea what you get from Fender for the approximately $1,000 to $1,200 that this guitar goes for, as well as the modifications that I put in my strat to get it the way it is now. As has been stupidly well documented through several threads, this strat has been a 3 month process to put everything together, but well worth it in my eyes both cosmetically and functionally. The modifications put in were as follows, Luxe Capacitors (one 1958-1961, and one 1961-1968), Callaham American Deluxe upgrade system, 2 Seymour Duncan SSL-1s, 1 Seymour Duncan Brobucker (11k), black hardware for pickup screws and pickguard screws, and 250k Pots with 10% tolerances. Ultimately, I sought to uncut the perceived corners that were cut by Fender in their interest of keeping this guitar at a somewhat reasonable price.

As a mahogany bodied / maple neck / rosewood boarded stratocater, its inherent properties emphasize less of the high-end, move its midpoint a bit lower than an alder or ash strat's mid, and brings out the lows a bit more. Think of it as making strat single coils a bit more P-90ish and you'll have a decent idea of what I mean. Now this doesn't mean that you're going to instantly get into SG Jr. Territory by putting in a strat single coil in it, but, it does mean that a traditional strat single coil will have a bit more bark / low-end to it than if it was in a more traditional strat. The configuration standard is HSS, however with an HSH body rout, the ability to change pickup configurations is limited pretty much by one's imagination; the ease of changing this guitar into a more traditional S-S-S, superstrat style X-X-H or H-S-H, or even tele style (S X S / H X S) is feasible so long as one can finid the right pickguard. Such modularity of pickguards to fit into the strat facilitate ease of switching out the stock pickups for those that better cater to the user's needs. Another key point of this body is the contoured heel designed to enhance access into the "high notes". While useful for those who play this guitar righty (as this is solely available to righties), those choosing to "Jimi it" will find no enhancement here except maybe a comfy place to rest one's pinky while going beyond the 16th fret. Nice if you need it, doesn't hurt the guitar if you don't need it. (I must note as a disclaimer that this guitar does NOT play nicely with the warmoth pro necks... the location of the truss rod adjuster is right where the contoured screw goes and the screw could seriously mess up the truss rod.)

Speaking of neck department, the Neck is fairly standard American deluxe fare (9.5" radius, C neck profile, 22 frets, abalone inlays), save for the tuxedo-style black paint / silver spaghetti logo headstock, a VERY nice aesthetic touch that compliments the black pickguard, but simultaneously limits choice to a black pickguard (or you risk running into the "mismatched colors" dilemma, which is especially prominent on a black-stocked guard. American Deluxe necks are often capable of being on a Custom Shop instrument, displaying nice straight grain, or a fairly consistent flame (in my case, a solid and fairly consistent A flame with tight striping exists) and have the rolled-sides for easier playing, medium jumbo frets to facilitate soloing, locking tuners (variable, some are true schallers, some are fender/schallers with the late 60s F's on them, mine are the latter... no functional difference, but they just look a little cheap for me), and exclusive to HSS variants, the LSR nut. The LSR nut deserves special attention for several reasons. Some people say that the LSR nut sucks tone away, or that the LSR nut's ball bearings get lost easily. Although this may be true and admittedly a trade-off, the LSR also allows for one to change string gauges without fear of strings binding in holes too small, or wiggling in holes too big; in essence a modular, low-friction nut that doesn't catch strings, doesn't require cutting or changing for different gauges, and allows for more dramatic vibrato action without losing tune. Going back to the aforementioned downsides, I will concede that losing one of the small ball bearings is probably going to cause some nightmares when trying to tune / divebomb, but with reasonable care the LSR nut should provide enhanced stability when used with the supplied Locking Tuners.
 
Re: HSS review

For all its strengths, there are two significant weaknesses to this guitar that a little aftermarket shopping can alleviate, the pickups / switching and the bridge block. First the bridge block, a block of resin-impregnated steel with pop-in ability. It pops in all right, but the block I had had so much play that the arm just as easily popped out... no force was necessary, all one had to do was turn the strat so the backplate pointed up, and out came the arm... if Fender had marketed this with the intention of an arm that could be pulled out easier than it was stuffed in, then they had made a winner. The saddles on the other hand, I have no complaints about. They are stainless steel, machined to reduce the angle which the strings come up and out of the block to reduce breakage. A good idea, especially for those with thinner strings who often experience string breakage at the saddles due to too sharp a transition angle. Furthermore, the resin-impregnated block is not the greatest at transmitting sound, in spite of it being fairly heavy (12 oz in my strat). Perhaps the resin dulls the rate that the strings can vibrate or kill some of the attack, or a method Fender uses to keep costs down in a bit, I'm not sure, but for a guitar that is a hybrid of American Deluxe and Custom Shop and has more low-end than normal, dulling the sound with a less expensive bridge is more than a minor holdback for this otherwise amazingly versatile guitar. The first major upgrade therefore was here. A callaham american deluxe upgrade block and saddles were ultimately purchased and the block is currently in my strat (I can't quite get the saddles to line up right, and i'm a perfectionist for keeping things lined up, not a fault of the callaham saddles, just my pickiness). The block is made of CRS 1018 (cold-rolled steel) with no resin or any thing to cheapen it, much like early strats, and the string balls stay right at the outer edge, so more strings go through the block itself, thus providing a greater anchor for the strings to stay in, and negating the use of the fender bullet strings. Immediately, I noticed a difference. First, the attack was faster with less mushiness; a more acoustically alive guitar as a result if you will due to the better quality block (which weighed in at 17.5 oz), and better anchored strings. As an added bonus, the block and it's delrin bushinged tremolo hole and complimenting vibrato arm (in '64 length with virtual pop-in screw) not only worked, but with 2 turns of the arm, a very nuanced experience was of vibrato. There was just as little effort needed to make slight vibratos as there was to divebomb sevenths and eighths, no binding in the nut, and most importantly, no second thoughts that at any moment the arm could fall out of the tremolo. Expensive as a Callaham upgrade may be, its stability / reliability / quality is something one should consider when upgrading a stock block.

The second major weakness is the S-1 loaded, texmex / diamondback pickguard. Here we have pickups that belong more in an MIM stratocaster than an american deluxe with in-house modifications. A major cost-cut here, or just my poor luck, I'm not sure, but the Tex-Mex pickups were fairly high output for stratocaster single coils (7.8k neck / 8k middle), and in a mahogany stratocaster, produced single coil mud. The 8.3k diamondback humbucker was no better, as it gave off the impression that it was a really large humless strat single coil with a LOT of mud (perhaps a result of the A2 magnet, i'm not sure). The S-1 switch, although widely variable in its ability to combine parallel and series wiring configurations together, is a wiring nightmare of huge proportions, with the normal red, black, white, and green wires, but also red/white wires, red/green wires, and purple wires as well. Fender was well intentioned here attempting to provide gibson-esque sounds, however there are two flaws here... fender shouldn't try to emulate gibson, and fender's strong spot is making great single coils; humbuckers should be left to a third-party that specializes in them.
 
Re: HSS review

Out it went, and in went a pickguard done by AcmeGuitarWorks with 2 Seymour Duncan SSL-1s and an 11k Brobucker (trembucker, 4-conductor, potted, double black)from the SD Custom Shop (Thanks MJ, it works great!). Although everything was slow in coming together, the combination of 2 6.3k SSL-1s and an 11k Brobucker in Lone-Star stratocaster configuration (double super 5-way with autosplit in pos 2, with neck and middle on one tone control, and the bridge on its own tone control). The difference was night and day. In the SSL-1 positions, traditional strat sounds were retained with a bit more low-end that's inherent in mahogany bodies. Played through a loaned Fender Super-Sonic, it was completely possible to get that signature 50s and 60s fender chime, with the typical hum in the single coil positions, as well as get the "little wing sounds with the drive turned up a tad. Overdriven, think Voodoo Child (Slight Return) and you have the idea. However, because of their proximity to vintage stratocaster pickups, they have that 60-cycle hum that may or may not appeal to everyone. I for one like it, but that's me. In position 4, the traditional strat quack is retained, although it has a bit more "honk"; again due to the mahogany body. The 11k Brobucker provides a super-hot PAF experience that can be described as a mix of a '59 and a JB mixed together. The balance of the '59 combined with the balls to the wall mentality of the JB. This is not by any means a bright pickup. Clean, this pickup pushes the amp into mild overdrive and gives a very strong impression of a Les Paul; not even the maple neck can overcome this pickup's tendencies. Dirty... 100% pure, unmitigated, Sabbath. This isn't a high output pickup (11k), but it's "Dump switch!" tendency means that it doesn't need much gain in order to scream, and yet just as easily it can clean up and get a nice jazzy sound. Very versatile. Last, but not least, the Luxe Capacitors. Luxes have a reputation of being brutally accurate reproductions of 1950s and 1960s capacitors found in early strats, teles, basses, and Les Pauls. They're expensive, at $15 to $30 each, but their ability to truly modify tone is unbelievable. Whereas the stock fender caps provided very little variance in tone, these can either run wide open, or suck out every ounce of high-end and mid-range imaginable, they truly are tone caps, and enhance the 50s / 60s aura aimed for in this guitar.


All in All, the american special HSS mahogany stratocaster is a great starting point for a guitar. With it's mahogany body, contoured heel, blacked out styling cues, LSR nut, locking tuners, etc., it provides a great starting point for a tweaker to make it his / her own. It's weaknesses, while existent and sometimes significant, are fortunately in places that are user replaceable rather than hard to access. Because of this, one can turn it into a gibson eater, a jackson demolisher, a jazzbox, with imagination, knowledge of pickup properties, and some spare change. What makes it a better bargain is that this is the only way to get a true Fender with a mahogany body without going to the custom shop and ordering a masterbuilt guitar. (According to Fender, mahogany is only available as masterbuild.) For $1,100 or so, some extra pocket change for ideas, and a good idea, one can make a very good guitar, a guitar that can be anything, to anyone, and do it extremely, extremely well.

This guitar rules, feel free to ask ?'s about it if you so desire.
 
Re: HSS review

wow,

you put a lot of time into this. thanks!

I'm taking your advice and ordering a Callaham trem block for starters. I'll also be locking my trem with a Tremol-No so I should get great sustain (not that it's horrible to start with but I agree that it could/should be better.) I'll hold off on pickup replacement until I have the hardware installed and I'll rewire everything at once. Maybe plan on a nicer custom pup like the Brobucker.

I purchased this guitar as a Gibson-killer and I think it really has potential! I could never find a Gibson that felt right in my hands. combined with their sloppy QC in recent years, and I'm sticking with Fender.
 
Re: HSS review

wow,

you put a lot of time into this. thanks!

I'm taking your advice and ordering a Callaham trem block for starters. I'll also be locking my trem with a Tremol-No so I should get great sustain (not that it's horrible to start with but I agree that it could/should be better.) I'll hold off on pickup replacement until I have the hardware installed and I'll rewire everything at once. Maybe plan on a nicer custom pup like the Brobucker.

I purchased this guitar as a Gibson-killer and I think it really has potential! I could never find a Gibson that felt right in my hands. combined with their sloppy QC in recent years, and I'm sticking with Fender.

If you put 5 springs in it, a callaham setup, and clamp the bridge, you'll have a clamped bridge that only goes down and is very stable. You might not even need a tremolno
 
Last edited:
Re: HSS review

Sounds like a cool guitar however I'm not sure I got all of that.
Could you elaborate a little bit more ?
 
Re: HSS review

what is it you'd like elaborated on?

:laugh2::laugh2: I think you missed the joke


anyways, I wanted to add something in regards to the LSR nut.

since it's probably not necessary to have one when you have locking tuners and it does alter the tone a little bit, it's probably worth swapping out.

good news is that Earvana makes a direct replacement for the LSR. It's one piece so you don't have to adjust or measure anything, just drop it in and use a dot of glue. And the LSR is already easier to remove than a regular glued-in Corian or graphite nut. Should be an easy swap.

granted, the replacement is a graphite-impregnated synthetic and not Tusq or bone, but it should still be an improvement.

they go for ~$35 shipped so it's not a major investment.
 
Re: HSS review

:laugh2::laugh2: I think you missed the joke


anyways, I wanted to add something in regards to the LSR nut.

since it's probably not necessary to have one when you have locking tuners and it does alter the tone a little bit, it's probably worth swapping out.

good news is that Earvana makes a direct replacement for the LSR. It's one piece so you don't have to adjust or measure anything, just drop it in and use a dot of glue. And the LSR is already easier to remove than a regular glued-in Corian or graphite nut. Should be an easy swap.

granted, the replacement is a graphite-impregnated synthetic and not Tusq or bone, but it should still be an improvement.

they go for ~$35 shipped so it's not a major investment.

What's the earvana do?

Jason
 
Re: HSS review

Sth like the Buzz Feiten system i.e. a compensated tuning nut.
If you ever felt that your guitar sounded out of tune in certain chords but in perfect tune in different ones then that's what this nut fixes.
 
Re: HSS review

not quite as precise as the Buzz Feiten system but usually an improvement nonetheless.

I'm more concerned with the drop-in factor though - don't really want to pay a tech to cut a new string nut for me, especially since I'm already having that done for my Tele Deluxe. the compensated tuning is just an added bonus.

Jason, check out http://www.earvana.com/technology2.htm

think of it as tuning your guitar like a piano - a stretched tuning.

I had Buzz Feiten on my old SG '61 and it was an improvement. The BF site doesn't seem to offer as much background as it used to . . .
 
Re: HSS review

hmm.... it's drop-in, but will it accept multiple changes without recut / replacement? (Ie: like how the ball bearings move right over for new strings). Also, does the BF system really work?
 
Re: HSS review

hmm.... it's drop-in, but will it accept multiple changes without recut / replacement? (Ie: like how the ball bearings move right over for new strings). Also, does the BF system really work?

the Earvana nut is slotted synthetic material like a regular nut so a string gauge change may require a new nut/recut. if you cut the slots really deep and use 9's for example, you might not be able to put 11's on there -just like a regular nut.

Buzz Feiten really works. like I said, had it done to my SG and was happy with it. you'll notice it most with chording. open chords sound sweeter and barre chords sound good across the entire fretboard instead of just the first 10 or so frets. With the cost of BF, you want to pretty much stick to one string gauge. I had it set up for 10s and pretty much had to leave it that way.
 
Last edited:
Re: HSS review

i may BF my LSR nut, they do offer that as well

Does BF have a new LSR replacement that still uses bearings?

cause a BF installer can't make a shelf nut out of an LSR - you would have to have a whole new nut CNC machined with the appropriate length "shelves." And with BF there's more customization and the length of each "shelf" may vary by string gauge. you'd have to talk to a dealer to see how much room you have to go up/down without having a new string nut cut (i.e., you still might not be able to run everything from 9's to 12's)

The Earvana is not customized in that way. I'm not sure what limitations there are (if any) on gauge. I know that they used to come standard on the higher end ESP LTD guitars and those guys would use 12's and drop tune. The Earvana nut lost some of it's effectiveness but the guitars would still function properly/ play well after a set-up.
 
Re: HSS review

Great review. I just picked up an American Special myself. I like the Diamondback pickup a whole lot. I don't have any problem with mud. There is a lot of clarity and articulation. To me it sounds a lot like a vintage low output humbucker or fat single coil. It cuts through great. The Diamondback humbucker is better suited in an Alder strat in my opinion. Nevertheless not bad in my Mahogany strat.

I can't say such nice things about the Texmex pickups. Those ARE muddy and twangy. They sound cheap. The output is ok but they don't match up with the Diamondback.

I totally agree that the Texmex belong in lower priced strats. They are like generic sounding Texas Specials but even muddier. Even on a Matchless Chieftain and Soldano 44 they lose all the brillance. With as much twang as they have they don't sound very good with a clean jangly amp.
 
Re: HSS review

Great review. I just picked up an American Special myself. I like the Diamondback pickup a whole lot. I don't have any problem with mud. There is a lot of clarity and articulation. To me it sounds a lot like a vintage low output humbucker or fat single coil. It cuts through great. The Diamondback humbucker is better suited in an Alder strat in my opinion. Nevertheless not bad in my Mahogany strat.

I can't say such nice things about the Texmex pickups. Those ARE muddy and twangy. They sound cheap. The output is ok but they don't match up with the Diamondback.

I totally agree that the Texmex belong in lower priced strats. They are like generic sounding Texas Specials but even muddier. Even on a Matchless Chieftain and Soldano 44 they lose all the brillance. With as much twang as they have they don't sound very good with a clean jangly amp.

The diamondback sort of reminds me of a P-90 true Humbucker hybrid of sorts. It can be a nice cutter, but the problem with mine was that it sounded muddy. I'm not sure if there's variance in Fender HB's, but mine was just dead. As for the Tex-Mex pups, it's not a good sign when the HSS's mexican variant, the Lone Star strat uses Texas Specials and it's $550 less than the mahogany HSS. It's really something Fender needs to work on (not cutting corners for "added value" on their high-end production work and not trying to make HB's). The S-1 to me is a waste of wires and makes things more complex than they need to be. If it had the same pups as in the american deluxe HSS's, I might have a slightly warmer view, in spite that I don't usually like SCNs / stacked single coils. (I'm a HB's are big, SC's are small type). For my money, I'd definitely invest in a solderless setup from AcmeGuitarWorks because they do great work, incredible customer service, and the solderless kit lets you switch setups in the strat in literally 5 to 10 minutes. It's awesome if you have 1 guitar at a gig and need to change things between sets.

It's really a "great guitar that needs better parts". Once that's accomplished, you have a guitar for less than CS price that can pretty much outroar any other strat it pleases. I'm thinking to get a 2nd solderless setup with Lollar vintage tweeds or vintage blonds to get a more truer 50s style that stays clean more or less end to end with Luxes of a more early 50s vintage for caps. I like the way that everything works once the cut corners are uncut, and yes it is Fender's best-kept secret... too bad they won't make it a mainstream production model, it'd sell like nuts as a cut-price gibson alternative with the right PUs in it.

Jason
 
Re: HSS review

Personally I don't like to mix buckers and singles. I know this is unrelated to your review, but my strat is H/S/H but it has three hums. If I'm playing singles i just like to have em all singles. Anyone else like that?
 
Re: HSS review

Personally I don't like to mix buckers and singles. I know this is unrelated to your review, but my strat is H/S/H but it has three hums. If I'm playing singles i just like to have em all singles. Anyone else like that?

:banghead::offtopic::banghead:
 
Back
Top