Re: I have Tried almost Every Dimarzio, Only a Handful of Duncans...
And why is this you might ask??
I am currently shredding it up with a Duncan Full shred, and really like it. I want to try a Demon, but. . .
Duncan pickups cost more!
So back when I was in school, $10-20 was a big deal. And now that Ive tried most of the Dimarzios, I feel Im part of the family.
I think Duncan should lower their prices to be competitive. They are the same thing. Hand wound in USA. They are no better, no worse. Just more expensive.
Not exactly - dimarzio uses a machine to wind each pickup to make sure that their products are perfectly consistent - this doesn't mean that their pickups are all wound the same, just that the wind is programmed into a machine to make sure each pickup sounds exactly the same as the next one.
Incidentally, this also saves on cost when compared with having to pay (and train, I presume) people to guide the wire onto a bobbin while it's turned by a machine.
Duncan also spends more money to ensure authenticity - i.e. getting the original leesona from gibson, using different wire for different pickups (single coils back in the day were wound with a different wire than was used on humbuckers I think), and manufacturing a lot of the parts in house, whereas many of those same parts are outsourced when you're talking about other manufacturers. Seymour even has the original notes from Seth Lover about the ratio of materials in the Butyrate he used on the original humbucker.
I have nothing against dimarzios, I just prefer duncans because there's more 'air' to the sound. It's more open to my ears, and I also like knowing that SD goes the extra mile to make sure their products are top notch. The only dimarzio I really liked was the VHPAF, which they discontinued to introduce the 36th anniversary, which has way too much low mids for a vintage pickup IMO.
I know it would be nice to have duncan lower their prices, but if you look in the right places, there's virtually no difference in used prices between the two.