I need Pickups to tame a bright Les Paul!

Re: I need Pickups to tame a bright Les Paul!

I think you are on the right track with the pots and the A2 pros also if need be.
 
Re: I need Pickups to tame a bright Les Paul!

Well I put back in the 300k volume pots and left the tone pots as is 500k I also put in a .033uF cap on the bridge tone pot and kept the .015uF on the neck both orange drop caps.

I think this may have done the trick and this is with SD Pearly Gates installed what i noticed is that it actually sounds a little bit thicker now and doesnt sound harsh on the high notes like it did. It still has the PG bite but more enjoyable to play!

I will see how it goes after a few days of playing and hopefully I wont have to make any more changes!

The Pearly gates is definately no cure for an overly bright guitar. I would go with 2 300k pots (vol & tone) for the bridge and leave the 500k's in the neck so its not too muddy. That would be the cheapest fix since you already have the PG pickups. A2pros would be your best bet in pickups if you don't want the 300k pots.
 
Re: I need Pickups to tame a bright Les Paul!

ha ha...ya never know!

have you ever tried the Filmore's?

I had a Fillmore bridge in a Les Paul Custom that I used to own. I replaced it with a Darkburst, not because it sounded bad, but because I wanted a different sound out of that particular guitar.

I have not had a Fillmore in my bright LP. I can tell you that having the Goodwood in it has improved the guitar 1000 percent. I was all ready to sell it because I couldn't get it to sound right because it was so bright. The Goodwoods cured it, and now it is my favorite LP. It's like Jim Wagner designed them specifically for this particular guitar. I don't think he could have done a better job had he had this guitar in his shop to try them out. Here is a list of what I tried before the Goodwoods:

Burstbucker Pros (stock)
59s (twice)
Alnico 2 Pros (twice)
Pearly Gates
Custom
Custom Custom
Custom 5
Screamin' Demon
Frailin
Seth Lovers (interesting)
JB
57 Classic Plus
WCR Darkburst
WCR Crossroads
Wolfetone Marshallheads

The Goodwoods sound incredible. They are pricey, but worth it to me.

My two cents.

-Mark
 
Re: I need Pickups to tame a bright Les Paul!

I had a Fillmore bridge in a Les Paul Custom that I used to own. I replaced it with a Darkburst, not because it sounded bad, but because I wanted a different sound out of that particular guitar.

I have not had a Fillmore in my bright LP. I can tell you that having the Goodwood in it has improved the guitar 1000 percent. I was all ready to sell it because I couldn't get it to sound right because it was so bright. The Goodwoods cured it, and now it is my favorite LP. It's like Jim Wagner designed them specifically for this particular guitar. I don't think he could have done a better job had he had this guitar in his shop to try them out. Here is a list of what I tried before the Goodwoods:

Burstbucker Pros (stock)
59s (twice)
Alnico 2 Pros (twice)
Pearly Gates
Custom
Custom Custom
Custom 5
Screamin' Demon
Frailin
Seth Lovers (interesting)
JB
57 Classic Plus
WCR Darkburst
WCR Crossroads
Wolfetone Marshallheads

The Goodwoods sound incredible. They are pricey, but worth it to me.

My two cents.

-Mark


Man you went thru quite a few pups! Maybe I will keep an eye open for some used Goodwoods!

thanks
 
Re: I need Pickups to tame a bright Les Paul!

I tried some Wolfetone Dr. Vintages in the bright Les Paul as well. These also mellowed the brightness out quite a bit. Very nice.

Not sure if I like these or the Goodwoods better in this guitar.

-Mark
 
Re: I need Pickups to tame a bright Les Paul!

A bright Les Paul? Sounds like an oxymoron to me. How did you come across such a thing?
 
Re: I need Pickups to tame a bright Les Paul!

A bright Les Paul? Sounds like an oxymoron to me. How did you come across such a thing?


Well maybe my Les Paul isnt as bright as I thought I think now it was just the pickups making it worse, I had a set of 59's and a set of PG's (Bridge pickups) both making the guitar thin and bright especially with high gain, when trying the C5, CC the guitar was definitely getting the chunk back with out biting your head off.

I'm giving the PGn & C5 combo another I will spend a little more time tweaking these!
 
Last edited:
Re: I need Pickups to tame a bright Les Paul!

A bright les paul is virtually impossible.
.




That's definitely possible from my experience....the Customs can be and usually are fairly bright due to the ebony fingerboard. I definitely put much darker pickups in those.
 
Re: I need Pickups to tame a bright Les Paul!

A bright les paul is virtually impossible.

+1 IME. The brighttest Les Paul I ever heard would be about as bright as the middle position on my Tele (which currently has stock pups). Even with a maple top and ebony fingerboard, the mohagony body and neck matched with those - IMO - horribly warm and mellow pups keep it from ever achieving Strat bite or Tele twang.
 
Re: I need Pickups to tame a bright Les Paul!

If you want a DECENT sounding guitar that isn't a bright, twangy machine (which to me are great machines) then get a Gretsch. IMO a WHOLE lot better than ANY Gibson. Corvettes are awesome guitars, but the true beauty is the White Falcon *drools*. But that's my 2 cents.
 
Re: I need Pickups to tame a bright Les Paul!

Anyways, many people just change the tone and volume pots to tame the highs.
Original gibsons pots are 300k, others are 500k. 250k is warmer an remove part of the treble / Brightness.

This is the key RIGHT here. My Les Paul Custom that I purchased in 1988 always sounded huge and warm, even with pickups that most people consider bright/harsh like the Gibson 500T or Duncan JB. I always assumed that this is a humbucker equipped guitar and must have come equipped from the factory with 500K pots, so I later installed a custom wiring harness with all 500K pots. I never put 2 and 2 together, mainly because I did a p'up swap at the same time, but after these changes my guitar started to sound bright and thin. I fixated on the p'ups and swapped them numerous times to no avail. I then fixated on my amps and had them serviced, re-tubed/biased - still to no avail.

Then the other day I learned that this guitar shipped with 300K linear volume pots.....so back in they are going as soon as I get a chance.....

JQ
 
Re: I need Pickups to tame a bright Les Paul!

Any of the Duncan a2 pickups, with the exception of the PGs should tame the highs a bit. I would say try either the A2Pros, Seths, or Antiquities if you want vintage output humbuckers, or the Custom Custom if you want something hotter.

+1
 
Re: I need Pickups to tame a bright Les Paul!

I'd try nickel strings first before altering my set up. You may try lowering the pickups also to get less brightness. I have not personally played a bright Gibson LP, I would suspect the pickups are kind of PAF and Alnico if they are bright. I don't see that as a problem. Just roll back the tone and maybe switch to the neck pickup like Eric Clapton did in the 1960's.
 
Re: I need Pickups to tame a bright Les Paul!

My LP is bright really on the B and E strings. The other 4 sound great! I've swapped out a few pickups and the bright two strings are pretty consistent. I think you guys may be onto the pot thing. I think you can put a 1 Meg resistor across the 500k pot and get a 333k? Is that correct? I may try that first to see. And should this be on the volume pot only? Thanks guys.
 
Re: I need Pickups to tame a bright Les Paul!

That could be an intonation problem or a problem of the treble side of the pickups being too high. I would expect the g string to be bright also since it is the loudest string. Try changing cap values before doing a drastic pot change. 300k pots can be really muddy. Every 70's Les Paul I played with 300 pots was muddy.
 
Back
Top