Oh, you're wrong alright. Any guitarist worth his salt bounces his guitars off the stage a few times a night.
That is truly stupid.
Anyone with half a brain knows you don't do that. You bounce the guitar on the floor in the music store, BEFORE you purchase it. Sheesh !!
In fact lately I have taken to an even better technique, which I call 'The Blueman Manouvre'. You select the Gibson guitar that interests you, then go and find a nice-looking Strat or Tele. You lift it down from the wall and take it over to where the Gibson is. You stand about 3 feet in front of the Gibson, raise the Fender over your shoulder and swing it by the neck into the Gibson's headstock. Whichever guitar doesn't break is the one you buy.
Thank me later when you're enjoying your new Strat or Tele.
Thing is I have seen more Gibsons with headstock breaks than any other brand. I'm looking at the SG Plans right now. Right where the truss rod access is, at point closest to the nut, there's only 5mm of wood below the truss rod nut. The thickness of the headstock in comparison is 15mm thick. Then you add string tension and the weight of the tuners...I'm no professional luthier by any means, but that's a really weak and vulnerable area that's just asking for trouble.
Ibanez necks always crack at the floyd nut.
I've never (knock on splintered wood) had that happen, so I wouldn't say "always" but I agree it's a stupid design. Just one more reason to never get a guitar with a locking nut.
I've never (knock on splintered wood) had that happen, so I wouldn't say "always" but I agree it's a stupid design. Just one more reason to never get a guitar with a locking nut.
A real gibson SG is not going to fall apart unless you abuse the hell out of it! lol
Its a guitar design that has stood the test of time for thousands and thousands of players both amateur and pro alike.
The internet has a lot to answer for as far as myths and rumors are concerned.
not gonna change it much...figured I'd add a 1/4" maple top to it to bring the whole body thickness to just under 1 3/4", a little bit thinner than a strat/tele. may even do a very subtle carve like the SG Diablo.
I realize i'll be changing up the fundamentals of the SG style, especially with the neck tenon size, but I also think it'll make a fantastic sounding guitar.
What do people play their SG's with, sledgehammers?
Fell apart? lolEVERY Gibson I ever owned ( and there have been several!!) fell apart on me out on the road. That was why I went to over to Carvin, Washburn USA and PRS they DON'T. The frets have worn more quickly the finish discolors and cracks + the necks are not as stable on every Gibson I have ever owned in comparison to other brand guitars I have owned.
Now I play Washburn USA, Carvin or PRS and other high end stuff but will never own another Gibson. Won't pay premium prices for the Gibson name when that won't stay together for me on the road!
I do NOT abuse my stuff and as a matter of fact I have guitars and amps that are over 20 years old have seen road work and still are in great shape. NOT the Gibsons I have owned but---.
Remember my non-Gibson SG thread?
Well after doing some research I've come to the conclusion that I'm not going to chance a real Gibson falling apart because of bad design. Also, if i ever meet TLD, he won't be able to break my guitar by looking at it.
So I decided to do the only thing more idiotic than looking for a better built copy of a Gibson SG.
After I earn my 2nd university degree which I'm starting next year, I'm going to build a better SG, from scratch. Slightly thicker body, bigger/more solid neck joint, nice chunky volute under the truss rod access. Possibly with a flamed maple top and a nice burst to go with it.
Yes, my graduation present to myself will be planks of wood.