Moonsorrow
New member
Just curious......i`ve heard from somewhere before that they are pretty much the same as far as tone,quality,ect... Any opinions? Thanks!
Personally I think they sound nothing alike, BUT... I've heard people say the sound nearly identical. Mostly those are people with Poplar bodied guitars that they wish were alder bodied(people with older MIM teles and strats mostly). And I think they're trying to convince themselves it sounds like alder. Not that Poplar sounds HORRIBLE or anything, and theres nothing wrong with poplar bodied guitars (one of my favorite teles has a poplar body). It just doesn't sound like alder.
......
a big +1I have a Parker Fly Deluxe that has a poplar body and a basswood neck. And this "poor man's" instrument costs $2399 new, so I doubt that poor men really can afford it
I also own an alder-bodied Shamray custom shop guitar, so I can only comment on the sound differences between those two.
The Fly has less low end (but this can be due to the super-lightweight construction of the guitar), and its midrange is a bit more "in your face". I wouldn't say there is a spike, it is just more agressive sounding. The high end I find rather the same.
The Shamray guitar has more lows and has a more balanced sound, but can be a bit dull at times. After all, it is not at the same level as the Fly, because it has a MIK B.C.Rich neck and cost me around $600. Also it uses a Russian "black alder" that was not kiln-dried, it was dried "under the bed". The guitar builder told me that that kind of alder has a sound more reminiscent of american basswood, so I don't really know if I have the right to judge alder basing my opinion only on my guitar.
So, treat my post only as a comparison of two different guitars and do not generalize it.
http://www.jemsite.com/jem/wood.htm
I've got a wood description here, that might help characterize the woods for you, and quantify the differences. Maybe at some point we'll copy it here on our site somewhere.
http://www.jemsite.com/jem/wood.htm
I've got a wood description here, that might help characterize the woods for you, and quantify the differences. Maybe at some point we'll copy it here on our site somewhere.
i don't mind my MIM Fenders that claim to be poplar... mind you i sold some as i didn't like their tone but the ones i have kept sound great for the buck.... i like denser heavier wood and my 1999 MIM Standard Strat is a heavy peice and i like it.. It should be poplar but you never know what Fender has under the paint sometimes..
Even if i prefer Alder Mahogany's and hard Ash's as well as Maples for body woods a quality poplar body is OK by me.... I'd buy an Ernie Ball Steve Morse in a second and it's a poplar body....
They're definitely very close. Since there is so much variability in wood, you could potentially get a great piece of alder and think that poplar sucks, or vise versa.
I have an old Poplar bodied Squire Strat. Poplar has a good 80's shredder tone. I like it...I think it's denser and harder than Alder
Alder is more expensive than Poplar. Poplar was used as a substitute in the 80's and 90's since it was getting harder to get quality alder.