CTN
The Drama Dude
Re: I've decided. DMT Baker Act > JB
It makes perfect sense to me because IMO, there are more similarities than differences.
To be fair though, I'm very particular about having tight bass. With the kind of stuff I play, I prefer to have lots of note definition, and to me, the JB is a paradox. Present upper mids SHOULD mean lots of note definition, even on the low strings, but it doesn't quite work out like that with the JB, and you end up with that loose, squishy bass that you talked about.
With the Baker Act, you get all the squish cuz of the Alnico 5 magnet, but none of the looseness, courtesy of the wind. and somehow, that wind coaxes out lots of upper mids, without any EQ shelving.
It seriously sounds like a tweaked JB.
So it's not that dumb, and if you had heard/played the Baker Act, I'm sure you would agree that it's not a retarded comparison.
It makes perfect sense to me because IMO, there are more similarities than differences.
To be fair though, I'm very particular about having tight bass. With the kind of stuff I play, I prefer to have lots of note definition, and to me, the JB is a paradox. Present upper mids SHOULD mean lots of note definition, even on the low strings, but it doesn't quite work out like that with the JB, and you end up with that loose, squishy bass that you talked about.
With the Baker Act, you get all the squish cuz of the Alnico 5 magnet, but none of the looseness, courtesy of the wind. and somehow, that wind coaxes out lots of upper mids, without any EQ shelving.
It seriously sounds like a tweaked JB.
So it's not that dumb, and if you had heard/played the Baker Act, I'm sure you would agree that it's not a retarded comparison.