BlueGuitar
New member
Re: jimmy page wiring: photo and explanation
PRS was using two humbuckers in-series out-of-phase with some of their rotary switch guitars, and I think it sounds great! Being wired in series, the out-of-phase linkage isn't so thin and whiny, and being out-of-phase, the series linkage isn't so darned thick and muddy. The best of both bananas! :banana:
As for me I'd stick with the Schector Superock wiring harness, because when I wired it up there were no dead positions. Once you put the two pickups in series by pulling out the rhythm volume control, you can split the coils and/or invert the phase:
http://www.blueguitar.org/new/schem/_gtr/superock_harness.pdf
I'd have to say that Gibson screwed up when they stole this idea from Schector (... or did Schector perfect the idea after stealing it from Gibson? I dunno!)
ArtieToo said:... The thing that was driving me nuts was that if you lift the neck tone switch, both pups lose their ground. It took me forever to realize that they actually wanted both pups full-on, in-series, with one out-of-phase. Can't imagine what that sounds like. :eek13:
PRS was using two humbuckers in-series out-of-phase with some of their rotary switch guitars, and I think it sounds great! Being wired in series, the out-of-phase linkage isn't so thin and whiny, and being out-of-phase, the series linkage isn't so darned thick and muddy. The best of both bananas! :banana:
As for me I'd stick with the Schector Superock wiring harness, because when I wired it up there were no dead positions. Once you put the two pickups in series by pulling out the rhythm volume control, you can split the coils and/or invert the phase:
http://www.blueguitar.org/new/schem/_gtr/superock_harness.pdf
I'd have to say that Gibson screwed up when they stole this idea from Schector (... or did Schector perfect the idea after stealing it from Gibson? I dunno!)