JVM410HJS Joe Satriani Signature Head

Re: JVM410HJS Joe Satriani Signature Head

Maybe he just really enjoys hobnobbing with artist relations people. Imagine if he switched to Duncan, then he could hang out with Evan and maybe we could get him here for a special guest appearance.

His main guitar - his chrome boy - had a Duncan PG set (check out his live in SF DVD). Too bad that guitar was stolen.
 
Re: JVM410HJS Joe Satriani Signature Head

The Egnater Armageddon is the only one that I know of. Having said that, the built in noisegate idea is a fairly new thing...

No its not really new at all. Its only been in the last few years that its been common. If you dig around the hot rodded Marshalls from the late 80's you find that many of the modders were doing noise reduction circuits. My JCM800 that was done by Elan Memron has a noise reduction circuit. If you open it up it looks like a urinal cake pasted to the inside of the chassis but its works extremely well and is dead dead dead silent.

Some of the hotrodded boutique amps from the era and years following also included it. Its just lately in the last 5 or so years with like the JCM800 2203KK that a noise reduction circuit has been included on normal models from everyday companies.
 
Re: JVM410HJS Joe Satriani Signature Head

Yeah, the Peavey JSX has a very effective adjustable noise reduction circuit built in.

Very cool. Thanks for that bit of info.

The amp market today is very competitive and companies that don't keep adding new products will stagnate, perhaps die. Small companies with a narrow clientele are probably at less risk than the big boys that can't afford to be left behind.

Blackstar's new amp reportedly will have effects and even a new twist: Modeled power tubes. Personally I think they would have done better modeling preamp tubes...and perhaps they are but I just missed it.

A Marshall head with noisegates. Who'da thunk it?

JCA is very close to releasing Retrotubes. Looking at the few photos of them that I've seen, it looks like they are clusters of encapsulated diodes, but I only gathered that from the pattern of light visible and have no idea what else might be in there. Will I EVER try them? That's uncertain. Supposedly they'll never go microphonic, never go bad...assuming they aren't abused in some way. But the key of course is how will they sound? The cost? Parts that last a lifetime will probably have a pricetag to go with it...much higher rather than comparable since there's won't be repeat business for microphonic or burned out tubes. They apparently will come in 3 flavors. I think it was clean, crunch and more crunch but I could be wrong. I've asked for a set to test drive...I'm a skeptic and also the first to admit that something is actually better when that's the case. I won't let sentiment get in my way. I don't think they are letting out to amateurs to test though...a shame since the pros by their nature are for sale. My opinion costs them only enough tubes to do the job.

At any rate, my point is that companies need to evolve or get left behind. JCA and Blackstar...as well as Marshall...have pretty much done what they can as far as tube technology goes. They've covered the various categories...pros, giggers and homies along a good variety of wattages and features in each category. Going digital lets them expand their product lines and keep the costs reasonable. I'd like to see the amp head makers, those heads with loops, put in two knobs and two small LED counters to allow pedal users adjust their send and return levels. Some people say that this loop or that loop doesn't work well with their pedals and that's likely because the S/R levels are either too high or too low. When I turned on the loop for my JCA22H, the amp howled in protest. I had my GT-10's S/R set up for my Blackstar HT-40. It took just a minute to adjust the levels so that it was actually better than the HT-40...probably because the JCA buffers it's loops with tubes. I think this would be an excellent addition to their line...plus an added reverb! Onwards and upwards...that's how companies continue to exist. -Rod-
 
Re: JVM410HJS Joe Satriani Signature Head

His main guitar - his chrome boy - had a Duncan PG set (check out his live in SF DVD). Too bad that guitar was stolen.

A bit off topic, but this is misleading. Joe has had several 'main guitars' for different time periods...and several Chromies. The time he was seen w//Duncans was a very short period, relative to his career. He can far, far more be seen using his staples-DiMarzios.
 
Re: JVM410HJS Joe Satriani Signature Head

^ Relative to his career, yes, I agree with you it's mostly DiMarzios. But during that era, which I believe he's got the best tone (Crystal Planet), his main Chrome Boy had Duncan PGs. He used it more than any other guitar during that period.
 
Re: JVM410HJS Joe Satriani Signature Head

^Wrong. Crystal Planet was recorded with dimarzio. Says so on album credits. Chrome Boy was his #1 and he didn't want to tour with it. QUOTE>The guitar he was most associated with during the nineties was a chrome-finished guitar nicknamed “Chrome Boy.” (This instrument can be seen on the Live in San Francisco DVD.) However, the guitar used for most of the concert was in fact a lookalike nicknamed “Pearly,” which featured Seymour Duncan Pearly Gates pickups.
 
Re: JVM410HJS Joe Satriani Signature Head

It's really not a complicated amp at all. You could dial in four useful sounds in about 10 minutes right out of the box. Set master volume 1 to taste and then set master volume 2 a tick higher for lead boost. Done.
 
Re: JVM410HJS Joe Satriani Signature Head

It's really not a complicated amp at all. You could dial in four useful sounds in about 10 minutes right out of the box. Set master volume 1 to taste and then set master volume 2 a tick higher for lead boost. Done.
Yep.
 
Re: JVM410HJS Joe Satriani Signature Head

The Egnater Armageddon is the only one that I know of. Having said that, the built in noisegate idea is a fairly new thing...
Marshall JCM 800 2203KK Kerry King signature amp has one.

Is this new JS sig amp functionally better than the JSX is what I want to know.
And for how much more coin?
 
Re: JVM410HJS Joe Satriani Signature Head

4 separate channels is a little overkill.

I don't really see what was wrong with the JSX. That thing sounded awesome. He had his own identity with Peavey, now he's like every other guitarist building off the JVM. Maybe that's what he's going for after joining Chickenfoot. Who knows?

I agree. the peavey was a great amp and I actually respected Joe more for working with them.. Im sure he care what I think, haha
 
Re: JVM410HJS Joe Satriani Signature Head

I'd just add that what modders were doing and what Marshall and other manufacturers have been doing are two different things. This is all new to me. -Rod-
 
Re: JVM410HJS Joe Satriani Signature Head

I'd just add that what modders were doing and what Marshall and other manufacturers have been doing are two different things. This is all new to me. -Rod-

????
Marshall is constantly behind modders when it comes to amp improvements.
They make the JCM800, people find ways to put more gain in it via extra preamp tube, so Marshall release the 900 with more gain, and people hate it because it has another preamp tube and transistors, and is noisy as hell.

People that use high gain decide to mod their amps to put in noise gates, and Marshall puts them in the KK2203 JCM800 model.

The JVM by far has the most gain of any tube Marshall I've seen.

Its a natural progression, really.
 
Re: JVM410HJS Joe Satriani Signature Head

I don't get the 4 channels is overkill bit when there are so many digital devices that store a hundred things. Patches/channels ....same thing really. I see plenty of folks with a lovely single channel deal with stomp boxes out the gazzo for many distortions and other flavors. What's the difference?
 
Re: JVM410HJS Joe Satriani Signature Head

The problem I've always experienced with channel switchers is different voicings for each channel. All I want from the next channel is to be able to get more volume and gain. Clean, crunch, scream. I REALLY don't want channel 1 to sound like a Twin, channel 2 to sound like a JCM800 and 3 to sound like a Boogie.
 
Re: JVM410HJS Joe Satriani Signature Head

I don't get the 4 channels is overkill bit when there are so many digital devices that store a hundred things. Patches/channels ....same thing really. I see plenty of folks with a lovely single channel deal with stomp boxes out the gazzo for many distortions and other flavors. What's the difference?
I don't get it either.
 
Re: JVM410HJS Joe Satriani Signature Head

Cool video for a cool amp... And I agree, channel 4 is way TOO much gain.

 
Re: JVM410HJS Joe Satriani Signature Head

Aside from that interview with Satch, soon after the JSX came our Satch wanted refinements and improvements, and Peavey was slow and not receptive to his suggestions. Meanwhile Marshall assigned Satch a full time tech to constantly make mods to the JVM until he was happy with it. Satch needed to use the Saturator pedal with the Peaveys, now he doesn't use them with the Marshalls.

That and in another interview he indicated they wanted a traditional Marshall tone for touring with Chickenfoot
 
Back
Top