Let's say my favorite tone is a Way Huge Green Rhino with my specific settings, a modified Dual Recto with a specific set of tubes, and a mystery 4X12 with no-name speakers. The Kemper will profile all of that. Turning on the Tube Screamer on my POD XT with a Dual Recto model and one of the 4X12 cabinet settings will not sound the same.
I'm not saying it's necessary, because I can get a tone I like with more or less any reasonable stack of gear, just saying that it's not the same.
The way your guitar amp sounds depends on the room it's in, the number of people in that room, the air density/temperature, etc. That's why exactly the same amp with exactly the same settings will sound different from place to place. I doubt that the Kemper can capture all of these variables.
Then again, who needs more amps when we know that nothing sounds better than an SLO?![]()
You mean a real SLO (How many have actually heard one of those in a room anyway?), not a modeled SLO. Except the Kemper model, which is still not the same as the real tube amp. except for your Personally modeled SLO....:lmao:
The PROFILER allows you to capture the sonic DNA of any amp with the press of a single button - a unique technology, called PROFILING™, invented by KEMPER™.
The PROFILER allows you to capture the sonic DNA of any amp with the press of a single button - a unique technology, called PROFILING™, invented by KEMPER™.
I'm guessing that you will not be adding one to your collection any time soon. Which is fine. Neither you, nor anyone else is obligated to purchase one. Just as anyone who has purchased and been satisfied with one is obligated to care that some don't see the point in doing so.This is some of the most useless ad-speak crap that I've ever heard for a product. "sonic DNA" is a made up term that could mean anything, and is captured using a 'unique technology'. Which again, could mean anything.
I strongly suspect "We run a frequency sweep through the amp a couple times to figure out it's relative EQ, then do multi-band tests of compression, and check the waveform for irregularities . . . . plug it into an algorithm and by hitting it with some DSP, a multiband EQ, and some multi-band compression end up with something that sounds like it's in the same ballpark." would be a lot more honest.
Which is interesting, because everyone says they can tell the difference between Kemper and real tubes, which means it doesn't sound the same either....
I'm guessing that you will not be adding one to your collection any time soon. Which is fine. Neither you, nor anyone else is obligated to purchase one. Just as anyone who has purchased and been satisfied with one is obligated to care that some don't see the point in doing so.
It's a marvelous world that we live in.
Sent from my Alcatel_5044C using Tapatalk
Wouldn't say that necessarily . . . I've mentioned it already, but I think the Kemper thing is a really cool idea. I've heard plenty of great music from modelling, so I'm sure they sound decent.
Just not a fan or worthless ad speak. Talk sense, or don't say anything.
Tubemeister 18 > Kemper
Well, Kemper does not come with my Tubemeister 18 sound out of the box. And, the tiny size makes it a no brainer for carrying to small gigs. Yet Kemper models Sansamp pedals. WTF?!?!?!?
So, I COULD model all four sound combos with the Kemper - or I could just use the Tubemeister, the foot switch, and toss a pedal of choice in there.
Tubemeister 18 > Kemper
I think the point is Vinnie (un-Ace) loves to piss and moan about confusing new technology. :smoker:
New technology? :lmao: From the guy who made a video on how to turn a vintage Marshall into a TC Dark Matter pedal. :smack: