kramersteen
PowerMetalRaph
Re: Locking nut replacement time?
Yamaha have a height adjustable locking nut which i think is a super idea.
Yamaha have a height adjustable locking nut which i think is a super idea.
Just put on a new nut, so not too keen on getting yet another one. But I did also buy a bunch of shims, so I'll try that. But still good to know for future use, thanks for the tip !Yamaha have a height adjustable locking nut which i think is a super idea.
So I don't think buzzing in the lower frets will be helped directly by adjusting relief.
That's exactly what relief is for, the lower frets.
Chad;4002704 Again said:This is completely wrong.
Yes they all affect each other, but that doesn't change the fact that action is set at the bridge, the nut is set just high enough to not buzz on the first fret, and relief is set so that there is just enough clearance when fretting the lower frets (1st through 5th basically).
You don't "set" the action in the middle of the board. Good action in the middle area is the result of setting everything else correctly.
This is completely wrong.
Yes they all affect each other, but that doesn't change the fact that action is set at the bridge, the nut is set just high enough to not buzz on the first fret, and relief is set so that there is just enough clearance when fretting the lower frets (1st through 5th basically).
You don't "set" the action in the middle of the board. Good action in the middle area is the result of setting everything else correctly.
Nope. A truss rod is there to counteract string tension and bring the neck out of back bow. Beyond that point, choosing to have some relief vs a straight neck is a matter of whether an individual player prefers higher/stiffer action in the middle of the fretboard (via relief/curve) vs more consistent feel and lower action (straighter neck).
That is the most basic explanation of a truss rod adjustment, but you don't have to believe me, here is just one of a multitude of setup guides that explain this. See the second sentence of step #9.
http://sfguitarworks.com/knowledge-base/anatomy-of-a-setup/
I'd never even read that link until just now, but perusing it I see that it also talks about how nut height can affect playability in the lower registers (see end of sentence 2 in step #7).
Sorry, but there really isn't a "proper" amount of relief. Backbow is universally bad, but after a neck is adjusted out of that, then .006" to .012" is a common range (that's where I typically set it 95% of the time). But it's still subjective. Some players do in fact prefer dead straight necks and can get away with it usually because they have a light touch. Then there are manufacturer setup guides that suggest setting relief to .020" or more.
Again, a truss rod is there to counter string tension and pull a neck of backbow. After that is achieved, then it is there to help a player subjectively set the feel/action in the middle of the fretboard. If you still disagree with that, then I don't know what else to say.
Because God is great, beer is good, and people are crazy.
No seriously, as was already stated, after relief is set and feel/action is good in the middle of the fretboard, then I would move on to adjusting the bridge height to set the action for the upper frets.