Agileguy_101
Master of his Domain
I've had more than my share of wah pedals over the years (MXR/CAE, 535Q, Vox, etc.) and for some reason I just never got along. Or perhaps, they never got along with some part of my rig. However, my band will be learning some covers for a few gigs we're doing soon and a few of them require a wah pedal. I'm taking this is as my opportunity to finally find a wah that works for my rig - to, as they say, go big or go home.
So I went to Guitar Center with the intention of trying out whatever the best wahs they had. Important note; because of the pedals I run in my rig (vintage type fuzzes) any wah I work with needs to be compatible with old fuzz pedals, ie have a fuzz friendly buffer or be true bypass. Anyway, I have my eye on the Dunlop Jerry Cantrell model, as I really like the throaty tone and overall darkness to his wah tone. However, they didn't have one of those in stock. What they did have was pretty nice - I picked out the Joe Bonamassa sig wah and the newest version of the Fulltone Clyde with the built in buffer.
I brought my guitar, amp and pedalboard and was happy to see that there were no issues with the sweep of the wah like I had been getting last time I used the wah into my fuzz once I turned the buffers on for each pedal. However, they were "teaching a class" inside the soundproof room, so I had to go before spending too much time with either. Quick impressions - I liked the whacked mode on the Clyde a lot, pretty throaty and growly like I enjoy. I found the Bonamassa to sound like that, but with a smoother high end and not as crunchy. However, the Clyde had a lot more versatility over the JB wah.
I guess what I'm asking is twofold:
Gearjonser, or anyone who has played both wahs, what do you think about the two as far as tonal distinctions?
Are there any other fuzzes that could fit my bill before I commit to either of these two?
So I went to Guitar Center with the intention of trying out whatever the best wahs they had. Important note; because of the pedals I run in my rig (vintage type fuzzes) any wah I work with needs to be compatible with old fuzz pedals, ie have a fuzz friendly buffer or be true bypass. Anyway, I have my eye on the Dunlop Jerry Cantrell model, as I really like the throaty tone and overall darkness to his wah tone. However, they didn't have one of those in stock. What they did have was pretty nice - I picked out the Joe Bonamassa sig wah and the newest version of the Fulltone Clyde with the built in buffer.
I brought my guitar, amp and pedalboard and was happy to see that there were no issues with the sweep of the wah like I had been getting last time I used the wah into my fuzz once I turned the buffers on for each pedal. However, they were "teaching a class" inside the soundproof room, so I had to go before spending too much time with either. Quick impressions - I liked the whacked mode on the Clyde a lot, pretty throaty and growly like I enjoy. I found the Bonamassa to sound like that, but with a smoother high end and not as crunchy. However, the Clyde had a lot more versatility over the JB wah.
I guess what I'm asking is twofold:
Gearjonser, or anyone who has played both wahs, what do you think about the two as far as tonal distinctions?
Are there any other fuzzes that could fit my bill before I commit to either of these two?