Lewguitar
New member
A guy posted this on Facebook. He has an old patent number Gibson humbucker in pieces and didn't know what it was. I asked him to measure and photograph the magnet. He did.
The magnet is not polished. It's roughcast. And it measures 2 3/8" x 1/2".
Not 2 1/2".
2 3/8" magnets were used in the T-Tops, and I've read were also used in some early 60's pickups before the T-Tops.
I'm thinking it's from the early 60's. The coils don't show a T so technically it wouldn't be a Gibson T-Top. The baseplate does have a patent number on it.
I thought this was interesting. I don't have any old T-Tops, but it's interesting to me that Gibson used sandcast/roughcast magnets in those days and not polished.
Last year I bought some roughcast 2 3/8" x 1/2" alnico 5 magnets and some roughcast 2 1/2" x 1/2" alnico 5 magnets from Addiction FX and put them in a set of Antiquitys.
I especially liked the way the neck pickup sounded. with a 2 3/8" magnet. More clear and not so bassy as when I tried that same pickup with a 2 1/2" magnet.
I wound up leaving a 2 3/8" RCA5 in the neck Antiquity and 2 1/2" RCA5 in the bridge Antiquity for a few months, before I put the original roughcast A2 magnets back in.
Ultimately I prefered Alnico 2. More mids, softer highs and a response I found to be more touch sensitive.
But here's the photo the guy with the old 60's Gibson pickup posted:

The magnet is not polished. It's roughcast. And it measures 2 3/8" x 1/2".
Not 2 1/2".
2 3/8" magnets were used in the T-Tops, and I've read were also used in some early 60's pickups before the T-Tops.
I'm thinking it's from the early 60's. The coils don't show a T so technically it wouldn't be a Gibson T-Top. The baseplate does have a patent number on it.
I thought this was interesting. I don't have any old T-Tops, but it's interesting to me that Gibson used sandcast/roughcast magnets in those days and not polished.
Last year I bought some roughcast 2 3/8" x 1/2" alnico 5 magnets and some roughcast 2 1/2" x 1/2" alnico 5 magnets from Addiction FX and put them in a set of Antiquitys.
I especially liked the way the neck pickup sounded. with a 2 3/8" magnet. More clear and not so bassy as when I tried that same pickup with a 2 1/2" magnet.
I wound up leaving a 2 3/8" RCA5 in the neck Antiquity and 2 1/2" RCA5 in the bridge Antiquity for a few months, before I put the original roughcast A2 magnets back in.
Ultimately I prefered Alnico 2. More mids, softer highs and a response I found to be more touch sensitive.
But here's the photo the guy with the old 60's Gibson pickup posted:

Last edited: