Marshall vs Laney

Marshall vs Laney

  • Total voters
    68
Re: Marshall vs Laney

I'm curious to play an old supergroup and klipp, but every laney I've tried from the 80s to today has average/decent at best. They're a pricepoint amp. There's plenty of modern marshall stuff that doesn't do much for me too, but there's a few good sounding marshalls available.
 
Re: Marshall vs Laney

Laney all the way. I used to run a VH100 into a 4x12 w/ Classic leads. MY tone absolutely burned. Best Lead tone i've ever played with. Like Vai on speed. The only amp of mine i've ever liked more was my Carvin Legacy combo.
 
Re: Marshall vs Laney

Well I've voted ... I was a JCM900 and DSL owner before I found home with AOR. Just a Pro-Tube might be a JCM800 clone, but to my ears the AOR Pro-Tubes are a differen beast, they are thicker, bassier, darker amps than same era marshalls. I love how mine overdrives, with Spina TS9 its just killer, the boosts are really tone toys. I am gonna also get Bueno boost to get that treble boosted Laney tone if you know what I mean. I am actually thinking of getting another AOR once I start giging again, because I am terrified of loosing this one, its a connection forever. And i will find at some point a SuperGroup too. Maybe a VH too. But my gut feeling that with the right boxes my AOR will give me what I need for many years ahead.
 
Re: Marshall vs Laney

Marshall for me. I just took delivery of the 8th one I have owned over the years...
 
Re: Marshall vs Laney

Well, I like Marshall. But I'd rather have a new Laney than a new Marshall. I mean the JVM line... wow, too many knobs. The Laney GH though is simple and the tone will blow people's heads off!
Laney has always been more cost effective for the same (and by the time the nineties hit, better) tone. I mean my old Laney is as good as a JCM 800 and it was what, 400$?
 
Re: Marshall vs Laney

I've had 2 Laney amps and a Laney cab- the whatever Marshall 800 clone they made in the late 80s, the 30w closed back combo from the same time period with gain and boosts and active EQ o'plenty and a Laney cab w/ 75 watt celestions.

Oh...and a "ghost" Laney- A Jackson (guitars) 50W Tube head.

The Cab by far was the best sounding piece of gear (I kept and used it for many years!)

Now in todays era of better tubes and mods and whatnot, I'm sure they would sound much better, but at the time, I though every one of them had farty lows, and fuzzy highs, and were generally dark and loose sounding compared to the Marshalls I had at the time. The Jackson head had the most promise I'd say because it had a variable mid boost/notch thing- but I ended up running a Marshall 9001 pre-amp into it which was a huge improvement.

TBH, I'm not really sure why I bought any of them at the time! :laugh2: The Shop I dealt with was blowing out the Laney combo- I remember that- and I picked up the JAckson head cos it had more low end "thunk" than the 900 Dual Reverb I bought- which I did NOT like.

The old Linebacker SS combos were pretty good for what they were.

Not to mention they were really cheap (feeling) compared to Marshalls of the day. Screws were always rusting and grills bent, "tolex" felt like plastic. Just alot of cheaper parts (of course Marshall has gone to hell in a handbasket too ,these days)

Overall- just have not been impressed with Laney enough to even bother searching out any of their modern stuff. It's expensive, can't find it locally, and the old stuff has left a bad taste in my mouth.

:shrug:
 
Re: Marshall vs Laney

I always thought of Laney as being a Marshall wannabe.

But then again, Marshall started off as a Fender wannabe...
 
Re: Marshall vs Laney

Laney is guilty of cloning Marshall just once - the first, non-AOR Pro-Tubes. However, I've read on numerous occasion that Pro-Tubes over all are better build amps than JCM800. Supergroup has very different tone from super leads, particularly because of huge Patridge trannies, from what I've undertood. And if anything, it Marshall is the one who is copying Laney with JVM as TT was the same idea years before. Plus, VH really did what DSL was suppose to do - high gain upgrade to classic sound. Laney does not believe in marketing that's the only reason why they are always a word of mouth sort of amp. The Lionhearts are more of a classic rock amp than vintage moder will ever be, its greatly made classic amp, what is vintagemodern? a transvestite of amps? Besides, who would want to play an amp made by a drummer?
 
Re: Marshall vs Laney

Dr.Mavashi said:
Besides, who would want to play an amp made by a drummer?
Click to expand...


Pretty much anyone who is anyone in rock music has played them,. From Roy Orbison to Hendrix to Metallica and beyond.

Laney has had one endorser of note- and he's missing half his fingers :lmao:
 
Re: Marshall vs Laney

JeffB said:
Pretty much anyone who is anyone in rock music has played them,. From Roy Orbison to Hendrix to Metallica and beyond.

Laney has had one endorser of note- and he's missing half his fingers :lmao:
Click to expand...

Marshall holds first place among the amps who are used as a stage prop with real amp hidden behind. Iommi just happaned to invent heavy metal and he did with Laney. And for those ture afficionado's of classic METAL - Gutter Ballet, Hall of the Mountain King, Streets, three milestones by Savatage were recorded with AOR. Paul Gilbert played VHs for years, so does Mathias Eklundh. And our amps are made by bass player who played in a band with John Bonham and Robert Plant, you guys can go ahead and let unknown drummers make amps for you.
 
Re: Marshall vs Laney

Dr.Mavashi said:
Laney is guilty of cloning Marshall just once - the first, non-AOR Pro-Tubes. However, I've read on numerous occasion that Pro-Tubes over all are better build amps than JCM800. Supergroup has very different tone from super leads, particularly because of huge Patridge trannies, from what I've undertood. And if anything, it Marshall is the one who is copying Laney with JVM as TT was the same idea years before. Plus, VH really did what DSL was suppose to do - high gain upgrade to classic sound. Laney does not believe in marketing that's the only reason why they are always a word of mouth sort of amp. The Lionhearts are more of a classic rock amp than vintage moder will ever be, its greatly made classic amp, what is vintagemodern? a transvestite of amps? Besides, who would want to play an amp made by a drummer?
Click to expand...

Vintage Moderns are pretty darned good. I think a Budda Superdrive 45 would blow one away but great amps nevertheless. I've A/Bd the TT and JVM for a long time. I think the TT sounds a better than the JVM although the JVM is capable of just a little more because of the extreme gain it has.

JeffB said:
Pretty much anyone who is anyone in rock music has played them,. From Roy Orbison to Hendrix to Metallica and beyond.

Laney has had one endorser of note- and he's missing half his fingers :lmao:
Click to expand...

I agree that the Vintage Modern is a great amp. You're wrong about Laney though. Players from Arch Enemy, Mastodon, Opeth use them. Plenty of other great players use Laney amps but don't endorse them.
 
Re: Marshall vs Laney

Gearjoneser said:
Hey, where'd the Marshall and Laney go? Oops, the Bogner ate them. :smack:
Click to expand...

Yep. Truth is nowadays I could think of probably a dozen marshall-style amps I'd rather have than a new production line Marshall, let alone a Laney.
 
Re: Marshall vs Laney

Hot _Grits said:
Yep. Truth is nowadays I could think of probably a dozen marshall-style amps I'd rather have than a new production line Marshall, let alone a Laney.
Click to expand...
Have you tried one of the Lionhearts yet?

Bogner - PA-lease, its just a german dude who was jelous he did not get a job with Engl so he started cloning marshalls.
 
Re: Marshall vs Laney

Dr.Mavashi said:
Have you tried one of the Lionhearts yet?

Bogner - PA-lease, its just a german dude who was jelous he did not get a job with Engl so he started cloning marshalls.
Click to expand...

Yet to see one available down here. I'll try one when they do appear, mainly because I'll try anything once. I will say this: they do look nice onscreen. It's good to see a Laney that doesn't look cheap and tacky.

I've gotta be honest, it's basically impossible to get worked up about a new Laney (or H&K statesman, or JVM, or whatever's new) when you're expecting new shipments from 65, Bogner and Divided by 13.

I'm not sitting around thinking 'feh, who cares about the 65 marquee club or XTC101B or the FTR37, what I REALLY want to hear is the new Laney'. And given the same opportunity, neither would you.
 
Re: Marshall vs Laney

I voted Marshall but to be honest I've never tried Laney. The local guitar store has some in stock so I'll have to give it a test run.
 
Re: Marshall vs Laney

Hot _Grits said:
I'm not sitting around thinking 'feh, who cares about the 65 marquee club or XTC101B or the FTR37, what I REALLY want to hear is the new Laney'. And given the same opportunity, neither would you.
Click to expand...

I am more of a Soldano and Trainwreck/Komet kinda guy when it comes to those ..
 
Re: Marshall vs Laney

I just disagree that Bogner is THE ultimate amp made, tonewise I think its a distant second behind Komet and Concorde.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

belensky
The Humbucker Archive: DiMarzio, EMG, BKP, Suhr & Duncan Tested – My Notes & Comparison Samples (Long Read)
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
Artie
Artie
ebagjones
Laney Ironheart 120 NAD - notes from a non metal player
Replies
4
Views
784
Phantasmagoria
Phantasmagoria
P
Pickups for Gibson Les Paul Std. from 1981
Replies
11
Views
685
EmiAba
EmiAba
G
NAD: Marshall Silver Jubilee Studio 2525H! (demo included)
Replies
6
Views
855
Guitarjon
G
G
Marshall SV20H vs SC20H vs DSL20HR vs 2525H
Replies
16
Views
4K
Ronnie_Snow
Ronnie_Snow
Back
Top