Re: Marshall Vs. Mesa
Don't like the Mesa fizz? Get the F series.
Got a pretty convincing Marshall tone out of my F-50 last week..contour on, pumped the mids to 3 oclock. Cut treble to 9 oclock. Bass was about 10 or 11 oclock IIRC. That was with my stock MIA strat. Humbuckers will prolly requre some tweaking. Not quite Marshall, but def a modded marshall sound. I don't care for modern sounds either, but my F-50 can pretty much cover everything I want...fender clean, mesa smooth, marshall kerrang
Not a fan of the MESA fizz either and it kept me from buying one for many years. But I'm finding with tweaking you can minimize it greatly and with a just a small amount it gives your leads some "cut' (which I like) without being obtrusive. The thing I've had to get through my thick skull was the tone controls are very sensitive and very interactive compared to everything else I've owned. It's not like a Marshall of Fender where you dime everything or a few things and it still sounds pretty good. They do require tweaking. But boy when ya get it tweaked right

The manual is extremely informative in explaining the sweet spots for the tone controls and where you prolly don't want to go with setting them.
A fellow on HC sent me a link to his webpage of recto clips, and even they are not too fuzzy. They sound more "mark-ish".
HERE is the link. Everything is a recto but the one entitled "free fall" (which is a MKIV)
That said out of all the ones I've played, the F-series and Lonestars sound the best to me.
I too am surprised the vote is this close.