Metalman_666
Well-known member
I know I know this has been asked before... but what gear exactly was used for the rhythm tone on that album... I've taken a shine to it.
Kac said:
Gibson Flying V (or Explorer, I don't remember), EMG 81 bridge p'up, 100w Marshall amps, and a Tube Screamer i think.Metalman_666 said:I know I know this has been asked before... but what gear exactly was used for the rhythm tone on that album... I've taken a shine to it.
Because it was a completely half-assed attempt at an album!!frigginalex said:So with all that rack gear and processing and high-end amplifiers, why did St. Anger still sound like crap?
Rotten Guitar String said:Gibson Flying V (or Explorer, I don't remember), EMG 81 bridge p'up, 100w Marshall amps, and a Tube Screamer i think.
You're probably thinking of Kill 'Em All. They started using EMG's for RTLex-250 said:gibson explorer (stock), flying V knockoff (invader in bridge pos.), 100w modded marshall, tube screamer
Rotten Guitar String said:You're probably thinking of Kill 'Em All. They started using EMG's for RTL
frigginalex said:So with all that rack gear and processing and high-end amplifiers, why did St. Anger still sound like crap?
Hames Jetfield said:Because the songwriting was poor. Production was one of least significant errors of St.Anger.
Kamanda~SD said:Because they didn't have a tuner, or a snare drum which they replaced with a can, and fought against solo's.
Hames Jetfield said:Nah, those are just easy things to blame in place of the larger problem facing that album. If St.Anger had crystal clear production, non-trash can snare,
solos, and non-detuned guitars then the album WOULD STILL be mundane. All those elements are just little irritating things that people notice easily and blame the albums flaws for.
St.Anger's problems are lack of interesting tonality and dynamics as a result of careless song craft.