thechrislnew
New member
Hi all, so lets say I wanted to have some options in my rig including:
--placing a phaser in the FX loop but having control of the wet/dry mix (which isn't on the phaser itself).
--Sending a signal briefly to a tape echo but then allowing the return to self-oscillate once the send is turned off.
Both of these could be done quite easily with a small mixer between the FX board and the amp. Would this affect the tone much? I know it will to some degree but I'm referring to impedance or level mismatch issues? Would I need some kind of Reamp device from the mixer output to the amp or at least something to pad the line level output?
I'm curious why this isn't done more often since small mixers are pretty cheap and there are a lot of other interesting things that could be done with FX before the amp with the versatility of a mixer in the path.
Thanks, chrisL
--placing a phaser in the FX loop but having control of the wet/dry mix (which isn't on the phaser itself).
--Sending a signal briefly to a tape echo but then allowing the return to self-oscillate once the send is turned off.
Both of these could be done quite easily with a small mixer between the FX board and the amp. Would this affect the tone much? I know it will to some degree but I'm referring to impedance or level mismatch issues? Would I need some kind of Reamp device from the mixer output to the amp or at least something to pad the line level output?
I'm curious why this isn't done more often since small mixers are pretty cheap and there are a lot of other interesting things that could be done with FX before the amp with the versatility of a mixer in the path.
Thanks, chrisL