I never completely understand threads like this. When you start ranking guitars according to versatility, what does it mean to say that a Tele is more versatile than a Les Paul, or that an SG is more versatile than a Strat? Or whatever. Are we making assumptions about the features and specs, here? Like the pickups, woods, construction, electronics, switching, bridge, etc.?
Personally, the kind of versatility that interests me doesn't come from a control array like that crazy B.C. Rich. It comes from versatility in the player, in the ability to listen and respond to the guitar, the pickups, the amp, and dial in a tone that works for what you're playing. The way I see it, the ability to do this, and the willingness to experiment, trump features every time.