Re: My StoneTone block review has begun
I have to laugh at the random Zinc-bashing in this thread. The truth about all these different block materials is that they ALL affect the sound and response of a guitar in different ways. Depending on the specific instrument and each player's subjective idea of what constitutes "best", it's possible for ANY of them to be better suited than the rest.
Zinc gets discredited a LOT in the guitar world, because it's not particularly sexy as a bare metal and it's one of the least expensive materials to acquire and form. Guitarists usually (and often erroneously) associate cost and/or rarity with being better/best, but Zinc definitely has its place. Not only is it used to make many top-grade hardware components that most players would never suspect (ex: the famous Schaller Floyd, most modern tuners, most Tune-o-Matic bridges, etc), but as a sustain block, Zinc has its own tonal properties that make it the ideal choice in some cases.
You think when Ibanez set out to completely redesign the Floyd Rose concept from the ground up in the mid-'80s with their renowned EDGE models, that they got down to the block and said "eh, no one will see it...just toss on whatever's least expensive"? Heck no! And those same Zinc blocks were featured on all of their premium and ultra-premium instruments, as well as those made in their L.A. Custom Shop. Ibanez wasn't ashamed of Zinc blocks, even during their "Golden Age", when cost was much less a factor than it seems to be these days.
We like to think of Zinc as soft and dead, but, interestingly enough, Zinc has a hexagonal crystalline molecular structure that is very similar to Titanium. Of course, they are still very different elements. Nonetheless, Zinc blocks tend to be fairly balanced sounding, not too bright, not too warm. I have actually gone to a Zinc block before to get a Floyded guitar's sound "just right".
The right tool is the one that gets the job done, regardless of what others think.
Now, is the Stone Tone the one tool to destroy them all? We shall see
