NAD Randall Thrasher
- Thread starter SGFanatic
- Start date
SGFanatic
New member
Re: NAD Randall Thrasher
What don't you like about the RD?
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk
What don't you like about the RD?
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk
Big Flannel
New member
Re: NAD Randall Thrasher
Awesome amp, man. I'm digging those axes.
Awesome amp, man. I'm digging those axes.
SGFanatic
New member
Re: NAD Randall Thrasher
Thanks. My new favorite is the Ltd MH-307. It's kinda beat up, but the.neck is amazing.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk
Thanks. My new favorite is the Ltd MH-307. It's kinda beat up, but the.neck is amazing.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk
Re: NAD Randall Thrasher
srsly? I had the M307 (which I *thought* had the same kinda neck, but maybe not?) as a kid, and maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan did I hate that neck. never woulda bought it offline, but all that Floyd Rose (licensed, haha) and EMG (hzs, which really arent) advertising attracted teenagers like my-then-self like moths to the flame... and over the web, you couldn't even tell
srsly? I had the M307 (which I *thought* had the same kinda neck, but maybe not?) as a kid, and maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan did I hate that neck. never woulda bought it offline, but all that Floyd Rose (licensed, haha) and EMG (hzs, which really arent) advertising attracted teenagers like my-then-self like moths to the flame... and over the web, you couldn't even tell
youngthrasher9
New member
Re: NAD Randall Thrasher
To each their own.
There people that shred happily on a fatback '59 profile neck, and people who do the same on the nothingness of a EBMM JP neck.
To each their own.
There people that shred happily on a fatback '59 profile neck, and people who do the same on the nothingness of a EBMM JP neck.
SGFanatic
New member
Re: NAD Randall Thrasher
I like the ESP/LTD necks, and I guess I'm a kid at heart, or as you seem to put it, a sucker for sub-par guitars. But I'm not saying this to defend my choices. What I'd really like to say is, I've seen your posts lately and you tend to come off as condescending, so I'd appreciate if you'd change the tone of your posts while addressing me. If you want share you're experiences with your licensed Floyd bridges, then let's talk. If you wanna dog my gear, then GTFO.
youngthrasher9
New member
Re: NAD Randall Thrasher
Hey i like my esp esp neck...liked their ltd ec500 neck, the old one, the new ec1000s are soso
I just never saw anyone praise the necks on their ltd 307s. Wondered if the MH was different, or hey, mb you have superlong fingers or smthn? Mine felt wiiiiiide and flatter than kansas
Gear? I see plenty cool stuff in that pic, im just surprised the cheapest plainest item is whats giving you a happy and wondering how that happened....oh well to each his own. Although if you ever have the spontaneous wish to donate that soso amplification youre unsure about to the poor, hey...im poor, lemme know
Hey i like my esp esp neck...liked their ltd ec500 neck, the old one, the new ec1000s are soso
I just never saw anyone praise the necks on their ltd 307s. Wondered if the MH was different, or hey, mb you have superlong fingers or smthn? Mine felt wiiiiiide and flatter than kansas
Gear? I see plenty cool stuff in that pic, im just surprised the cheapest plainest item is whats giving you a happy and wondering how that happened....oh well to each his own. Although if you ever have the spontaneous wish to donate that soso amplification youre unsure about to the poor, hey...im poor, lemme know
Last edited:
Re: NAD Randall Thrasher
<3 u 2 man
Think you could maybe react at my level of alleged impoliteness when commenting on it? No need for reproductive organ symbolism, we have geetazs for dat
<3 u 2 man
Think you could maybe react at my level of alleged impoliteness when commenting on it? No need for reproductive organ symbolism, we have geetazs for dat
SGFanatic
New member
Re: NAD Randall Thrasher
What's your problem dude? Do you not understand proper social etiquette? Just tone down the elitist crap, you're nothing but text on a screen as far as I'm concerned. This is the last response you'll get from me.Hey i like my esp esp neck...liked their ltd ec500 neck, the old one, the new ec1000s are soso
I just never saw anyone praise the necks on their ltd 307s. Wondered if the MH was different, or hey, mb you have superlong fingers or smthn? Mine felt wiiiiiide and flatter than kansas
Gear? I see plenty cool stuff in that pic, im just surprised the cheapest plainest item is whats giving you a happy and wondering how that happened....oh well to each his own. Although if you ever have the spontaneous wish to donate that soso amplification youre unsure about to the poor, hey...im poor, lemme know
youngthrasher9
New member
Re: NAD Randall Thrasher
I can say, without any hint of sarcasm, that this was very well thought out way of saying that.
It's not necessarily your intentions behind your comments, it's just that the way you have been coming off is elitist.
Be careful of how you word things, and try to keep your intentions clear, and you will be accepted a little better around here.
I'm not trying to be a dbag back to you, I'm just trying to show you very clearly how your posts have been interpreted. I'm trying to help you out.
I can say, without any hint of sarcasm, that this was very well thought out way of saying that.
It's not necessarily your intentions behind your comments, it's just that the way you have been coming off is elitist.
Be careful of how you word things, and try to keep your intentions clear, and you will be accepted a little better around here.
I'm not trying to be a dbag back to you, I'm just trying to show you very clearly how your posts have been interpreted. I'm trying to help you out.
youngthrasher9
New member
Re: NAD Randall Thrasher
While his wording was hard to decipher, I think this is what he is trying to get across:
He saying that you've got a really nice bunch of gear, and that he's surprised that you'd pick the mh-307 as your pick of the litter.
So I think he's trying to complement your gear whilst trying understand your love for that particular guitar.
While his wording was hard to decipher, I think this is what he is trying to get across:
He saying that you've got a really nice bunch of gear, and that he's surprised that you'd pick the mh-307 as your pick of the litter.
So I think he's trying to complement your gear whilst trying understand your love for that particular guitar.
SGFanatic
New member
Re: NAD Randall Thrasher
I disagree. I think he's either trying to prove something beyond the scope of necessary constructive criticism, which only serves the purpose of some elitist schtick that he's holding on to, or there is some kind of cultural communication gap that I'm not understanding.
Similar threads
